Engagement with services users and carers

Engagement with service users and carers must be meaningful, not tokenistic. People with direct experience of mental health problems or a learning disability should have a central role in the design and delivery of mental health services.

 

Involving service users in the delivery of health services is beneficial. Research shows that service users who work with health services have fewer hospital admissions and better quality of life.

   While person-centred care and service user involvement is promoted in the NHS, in practice it often remains tokenistic and service users are not adequately supported, trained or paid for their time


Read More...

 

 

 

 

Read the Fair Deal Manifesto

 

Fair Deal pdf

 

Read the Engagement with Service Users and Carers section

 

Engagement

 

 

 

 

The need for a fair deal

Government policy in the UK strongly endorses the engagement of service users and carers in the design and delivery of mental health services.1–4 Policies exist concerning the participation of users and carers in the training of health and social care professionals5 and in the planning and undertaking of research.6

 

These policies stem from the recognition that patients’ involvement can empower service users and carers. It can ensure that policies and service design reflect patients’ needs and preferences and lead to a more effective healthcare system. They also reflect wider NHS commitments to democratic and effective decision-making.

Government policy is, however, less clear about what constitutes involvement and how it should be achieved in the NHS. Models of service user engagement around the country – for example Mersey Care NHS Trust – provide a blueprint for how things could be done.

 

What we are calling for
  • Mental health trusts to involve patients and carers in the design, commissioning and delivery of mental health services, staff training and research or audit programmes.

 

  • Trusts to engage service users in evaluating the service users’ involvement in their trust and in taking steps to remedy barriers revealed. 

 

  • Trusts to ensure that a champion of patient involvement is a member of the trust’s board.

 

Examples of what the College will do
  • The College will continue to integrate service users and carers into their main areas of work (including research, training and quality improvement) and will develop and share best practice with other medical Colleges.

 

  • We will audit and promote the involvement of service users and carers in the training and education of all junior psychiatrists.

 

  • We will develop an assessment tool for measuring the well-being of carers.

 

  • With other partners we will further best practice between psychiatrist and the patient on the use of and withdrawal from medication.

 

  • We will work to support the physical and emotional well-being of carers of people with learning disabilities who present challenging behaviour.

 

Design and delivery of services

Service users and carers have an important role to play in the design and delivery of mental health and learning disability services. This should lead to more accessible and acceptable services and ultimately improve the service users’ health and quality of life. Numerous case studies have detailed the benefits of service user involvement, but there is little systematic evidence of the effects of such involvement on the quality and effectiveness of services, underlining the need for research.7

 

Barriers to involving users and carers in the design and delivery of mental health services are well known and are being addressed in some NHS trusts.8,9 Some good work is already under way, focusing on:

the need for users and carers to integrate into the trust’s meeting and management procedures

lack of concrete incentives in which users could participate

organisational attitudes to how representative individual users and carers are of the wider group of service users and carers, or their ability to make useful or rational contributions

lack of investment in supporting and building capacity among carers and users

issues about independence and freedom of users and carers to act (such as the absence of user-defined agendas, independent funding sources, or user or carer-only forums).

Service users – including those with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder – have been employed in clinical teams to engage with and coordinate the care of other service users. Studies indicate that employing users in case management or outreach services is beneficial; the individuals they work with appear to have fewer hospital admissions and an improved quality of life than comparable groups.8

 

Dr Dave Fearnley, consultant forensic psychiatrist, Medical Director & Deputy Chief Executive of Mersey Care NHS Trust

‘I have been promoting the involvement of service users and carers in consultant appraisals in the Trust for the past 2 years. We are also planning for service users and carers to meet consultants during the appraisal year to undertake a semi-structured interview about the ways they try to involve service users and carers in their work.’

 

A well-known and often cited model of service user involvement is the Mersey Care NHS Trust.10 The ‘Mersey care way’ is spearheaded by a director for service user and carer involvement who sits on the trust board, but is driven by a network of lead officers for involvement across all trust services. Furthermore, users and carers are involved in all aspects of staff training and recruitment and a Service User and Research Evaluation Group was established to develop user-led and controlled research.

 

Case study 1

Engagement within the Royal College of Psychiatrists

The Royal College of Psychiatrists is committed to involving service users and carers in all its activities. Service User Recovery and Carer forums have been established to support and provide input into the work of the College. A national network of service users and carers has also been developed to inform policy development.

 

Training

The benefits of involving users and carers in the training of healthcare and social care professionals stem from their unique understanding of mental health problems and their ability to help assess professionals’ social and communication skills.11 In 2005, the Royal College of Psychiatrists advocated that all psychiatric trainees must receive training from service users and carers.12 However, 3 years on, the College has found that in existing training this is still patchy and under-funded. In response, we are developing training materials with examples of good practice to be adopted by psychiatric trainers across the UK.12

 

Case study 2

Engaging with Service Users

The College’s quality improvement programmes are increasingly engaging with service users and carers, who help to inform and shape the work of the College Centre for Quality Improvement. Users and carers are represented on steering groups and standards development workshops and many also take part in peer-review visits to other mental health services, interviewing staff and service users. For some projects, participating trusts are only permitted to take part if they commit to recruiting and supporting service users to work with them locally, to help improve services.

 

Research

Involving users and carers in research is equally important, as they bring to studies their insights, experience and skills.6,13 This includes users’ personal knowledge of what it feels like to undergo treatment or manage the side-effects of medication. It also requires serious consideration of the often neglected experiences of carers. Furthermore, service users’ and carers’ priorities for research can be very different from those of academics.

 

Case study 3

Developing and Testing the Carer Well-Being and Support Questionnaire

Researchers at the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Research and Training Unit (CRTU) have been funded by the Department of Health to develop and test a questionnaire for accurately measuring the well-being of carers and their satisfaction with the support they receive. The aim is to produce a credible instrument for assessing important aspects of a carer’s experience which carers themselves will like because it will ask relevant questions in the right way. The questionnaire will be used to assess a carer’s need for support and to monitor whether the services provided are meeting those needs. The CRTU is undertaking the study in partnership with Rethink and the Alzheimer’s Society.

 

Users and carers can become involved in research in different ways, for example by:

acting as partners in the research study

advising on the key questions and methods to address these

assisting with data collection and analysis.

More rarely, research projects can be led by users and carers themselves, with service users who are trained and supported to undertake the research. However, in practice, it is often the case that users and carers are not meaningfully involved in the research process in any form, with lip service being paid to their involvement.

Clear guidance is needed on how researchers could meaningfully involve users and carers in their studies, as this is still lacking. Furthermore, a range of groups should be involved in research, including hard-to-research-with groups such as prisoners or individuals in secure mental health services. Finally, funding needs to be made available within trusts and nationally to ensure that barriers to involvement, such as payment, are overcome and that user and carer-led research studies become more commonplace.

 

Case study 4

Mersey Care NHS Trust10

Mersey Care NHS Trust provides specialist mental health and learning disability services for the people of Liverpool, Sefton and Kirkby. Their success in involving service users and carers was recognised in the clinical governance review carried out by the Healthcare Commission. It described the level of service user and carer involvement in all aspects of the Trust’s work as, 'exemplary' and 'impressive'. The Trust has also won awards for its work.

Service users and carers are not involved in Mersey Care because it will be good for them, good for the Trust, or because it is the policy flavour of the government of the day. Service users and carers are involved because they are valued citizens with a whole range of knowledge and experience as people as well as knowledge and experience of Trust services.

 

The Trust Board has adopted a ‘rights based approach’ in its work. Their strategy makes it clear that, 'We must think about people’s rights in everything that we do. Legal rights such as the right to life; carers’ right to an assessment of their needs; the right to aftercare. Social rights that are important to us all like the right to be heard; the right to be free from poverty; the right to a meaningful life.'

Central to this approach is a Board-level commitment to the rights of service users to be involved in decisions that affect their lives. This has involved appointing a Director for Service User and Carer Involvement. Leads in service user involvement have also been set up for different parts of the service.

 

Service users and carers are offered payment for their time (£12 an hour plus expenses). This sends a clear message that their time and effort and contribution to the Trust is of equal value to that of staff and managers. The Trust Board agreed an initial budget of £50 000 for this purpose but has now increased it to £120 000 – based on a detailed 3-year development plan.

In a series of informal road-shows, the Trust listened to how service users and carers wanted to be involved. Overwhelmingly, they wanted a say about the staff that work with them – the people who come into their homes and their lives when they are sometimes at their most vulnerable. They said that they wanted people with skills and experience but also with empathy and understanding.

 

So the Trust began there – with training service users and carers in all aspects of recruitment and selection and enabling them to take part as equals in the selection of Mersey Care staff. Over 100 service users and carers have now been trained in recruitment and selection by other service users and carers and have been involved in the appointment of over 1500 staff – about a third of the Trust workforce.

 

The SURE (Service User Research and Evaluation) Group was set up and supported to take on research projects of their choosing. These included, among others, acute solutions, an audit of in-patient wards in adult mental health services, an audit of service user and carer involvement in recruitment and selection, a review of the in-patient detoxification unit in the drugs service. Others were concerned about the right to make informed decisions and choices and the quality of information provided by the Trust, so the group became involved in the development of the Trust’s website and the development of an information strategy.

 

 

References

1   Department of Health (2004) Patient and Public Involvement in Health. The Evidence for Policy Implementation. Department of Health.

2   NHS Scotland (2006) Delivering for Mental Health in Scotland. Scottish Executive.

3   Adult Mental Health Services (2005) Raising the Standard. The Revised Adult Mental Health National Service Framework in Wales. Welsh Assembly Government.

4   Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (2005) A Strategic Framework for Adult Mental Health Services in Northern Ireland. DHSSPS.

5   Department of Health (1999) National Service Framework for Mental Health. Department of Health.

6   Department of Health (2000) Working Partnerships. Consumers in Research Third Annual Report. Department of Health.

7   Crawford, M. J., Rutter, D., Manley, C., et al (2002) Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ, 325, 1263–1265.
doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263
PMid:12458240    PMCid:136920

8   Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., et al (2004) Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1973–1984.
doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00401-5

9   Restall, G. & Strutt, C. (2008) Participation in planning and evaluating mental health services: building capacity. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 234–238.
doi:10.2975/31.3.2008.234.238
PMid:18194951

10   Mersey Care NHS Trust (2007) Involving Service Users and Carers – The Mersey Care Way. Mersey Care NHS Trust.

11   Haeny, O., Moholkar, R., Taylor, N., et al (2007) Service user involvement in psychiatric training: a practical perspective. Psychiatric Bulletin, 31, 312–314.
doi:10.1192/pb.bp.106.013714

12   Royal College of Psychiatrists (2004) Press release: Royal College of Psychiatrists pledges mandatory involvement of patients and carers in psychiatrists' training. Royal College of Psychiatrists.

13   Trivedi, P. & Wykes, T. (2002) From passive subjects to equal partners. Qualitative review of user involvement in research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 468–472.
doi:10.1192/bjp.181.6.468
PMid:12456515

© 2008 Royal College of Psychiatrists