|
Russell Gibson is
a 4th year medical student at Cardiff
University
Poverty

Empiricist philosophy was founded upon the
belief that a child is born with a mind that is a tabula rasa – a
‘blank state’, with the child’s ensuing development entirely
attributable to the environment to which they are exposed. Modern
views incorporate the role of genetic inheritance, but it is hard
to see how children can overcome maltreatment, neglect, inadequate
parenting and poor schooling. These are risk factors for juvenile
offending, factors that tend to coalesce around one single
denominator: poverty.
Detention centres
Current findings suggest the higher rates of
crime found among children of low socioeconomic status are mediated
through the disparate effects of poverty on a child’s life course,
be that adverse family, individual, school or peer factors
(i).
It must therefore be the utmost priority for
youth detention centres to act as places of nurture and
rehabilitation, rather than punishment. Stereos, Playstations
and pool tables may seem to reward criminality, but lest we forget,
these offenders are also children. Indeed, the greatest outrage is
that life inside the detention centre is often preferable to that
outside, not merely in material terms but also in basic parental
input.

Detention centre staff provide excellent
support for these children, often becoming the parental figures
otherwise lacking. However, they also report their input is
ultimately limited, for when the child leaves, he or she re-enters
the same environment that led to crime in the first place. Social
workers can and do intervene, but removing children from their
parents comes at a cost. And often, it comes too late.
So we blame the parents, as occurred following
the UK riots in the summer of 2011. However, parents are often
products of environments similar to those they now provide for
their children. This is a self-sustaining cycle of crime,
punishment and missed opportunity where the inadequate parenting
received by one generation is passed on to the next.
Wider problem
Youth offending, therefore, will never be
cured by detention centres, as it is merely a symptom of a much
wider problem: social injustice. It incorporates more than
socio-economic disparity: inequality of opportunity, from finding a
job to experiencing prejudice. We expect poor children to act
a certain way and we don’t give them the opportunity to act
otherwise.
As future doctors, we cannot prescribe a cure
for criminality, but being unable to treat does not mean we should
not strive to understand the cause. After all, we too are the
product of environments into which we just happened to be born.
| |
Percentage among sentenced young offenders by
sex (ii)
|
| |
Male |
Female |
| Mental and
emotional problems |
14 |
22 |
| Been admitted to
mental health ward |
4 |
9 |
| Personality
disorder |
80 |
84 |
| Hazardous
drinking |
70 |
51 |
| Use of illicit
drugs |
96 |
84 |
|
Drug dependence (not alcohol)
|
57 |
56 |
References:
i. Fergusson D, Swain-Campbell N, Horwood J
(2004). How does childhood economic disadvantage lead to crime?
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 45(5): 956-66.
ii. Lader D, Singleton N and Meltzer H
(2000).
|