October 2007

 

1. Message from the President: Professor Sheila Hollins

I am delighted to announce that Prof Dinesh Bhugra is our President-elect and will be inaugurated as President on 2nd July 2008 at the College AGM to be held at Imperial College in London. Until then Dinesh will work closely with me on matters of national and international importance in psychiatry, as well as listening to the concerns of individual members. We will now start the election process for a new Dean - a role Dinesh has held so ably for nearly five years.

A matter of considerable importance was the publication last week of Sir John Tooke's interim report on postgraduate education. Sir John called his report 'Aspiring to Excellence' (http://www.mmcinquiry.org.uk/draft.htm). He makes many recommendations which the College welcome. I will highlight a couple. He suggests that the first foundation year should revert to a pre-registration house year linked to the completion of a medical degree. The next three years would form core training in clusters of disciplines during which trainees will have longer to choose their preferred specialty and longer to demonstrate their competencies. If this is adopted run through training will not survive. He also called for more flexibility and easier transition between training grades and Trust grades.

At the AGM three years ago, a resolution about psychiatry in China led to a commitment to find a way for the College to offer some training in China. Last month, three College officers and our International manager attended the first WPA conference held in Shanghai. There was a College symposium on mental health legislation around the world with contributions from England, Egypt and Shanghai. We also had talks with the British Council, met psychiatrists working in mainland China and visited the Shanghai Mental Health Centre. Our report will be considered at the next meeting of the Board of International affairs.

 

 

2. NICE guidance on the treatment of Alzheimer’s: Judicial Review

In September NICE published an amended version of its technology appraisal of drugs to treat Alzheimer's disease to fully comply with the judge's ruling on the judicial review. The guidance issued in November 2006 still stands and drugs continue to be recommended only for people with moderate Alzheimer's disease. In line with the judge's ruling NICE has clarified how the guidance should be applied to certain groups including people with learning difficulties and whose first language is not English. The amended guidance is available at http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA111.

 

 

3. Johnson makes Commons Statement on Health and Social Care – “More funds for talking therapies.”

Health Secretary Alan Johnson used a statement on Health and Social Care to outline plans to spend millions more on "talking treatments" for depression and anxiety in England. He said that by 2010, £170m a year would be spent - allowing 900,000 more people to be treated using psychological therapies.

The new plan aims to reduce the current average 18 month wait for treatment to just a fortnight, in line with improvements in outpatient waiting times in other parts of the NHS.

The Department of Health said that all GP surgeries would have access to the treatments as the programme "rolled out" across the country. It is planned to recruit an extra 3,600 therapists.

The whole speech itself was an explanation of the measures proposed in the PBR and CSR. As would be expected it focused on the Darzi review’s four over-arching themes: fairness, personalisation, innovation and safety. The announcements on “talking treatments” came under the theme of ‘personalisation’.

To read more, click here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7037400.stm

Click here for our response: http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pressparliament/pressreleases2006/pr955.aspx

 

 

4. Attending the Party conferences

The College attended the Liberal Democrat, Labour, and Conservative conferences this year in Brighton, Bournemouth, and Blackpool respectively. The Royal College of Psychiatrists' activity at the party conferences was led by Dr Ian Hall, the Chair of the Westminster Parliamentary Liaison Committee (WPLC), and organised by Neil Balmer, the College's Public Affairs Officer (nbalmer@rcpsych.ac.uk).

The party conferences give the College the opportunity to meet with key Parliamentarians and other mental health organisations, attend and speak in debates on topical policy issues, and, more generally, gain an insight into the direction in which the political parties are developing their policy.

Through the College's policy process, we decided on the key issues which we wanted to lobby on at the conferences and produced a conference newsletter to take to the conferences. The issues we focussed on primarily in one-to-one meetings, fringe meeting debates, and round table discussions were mental health and employment, mental health in the criminal justice system, and military mental health. We also discussed legislative work, including further work on the Mental Health Act Code of Practice, and the proposed Health and Social Care Bill.

A full conference report and analysis will be available on the website at a later date. We are already making plans for next year's activity and would welcome any feedback or suggestions from Members.

 

 

5. College Policy Documents: root and branch review: Dr Ola Junaid, Associate-Registrar (Policy)

I was appointed Associate Registrar for policy earlier this year. My first task was to undertake a review of College reports.

My terms of reference are: ‘A root and branch review of all Council reports to inform CEC how these reports arose, what has triggered them, what purpose they have and continue to serve, and how they are used by members of the College, general mental health service professionals, and policy makers.

‘Re-examine all College Reports, ascertain what had instigated the drafting of the reports, determine how widely reports were open to consultation, and to differentiate between College documents and Faculty documents.’

I identified 115 College reports, of which 79 are currently available on line. Most fit into one of the following four categories:

  • clinical guidance
  • advice on service provision
  • formal College response to white papers and other reports
  • advice to members, usually relating to training or professional matters

My recommendations for the College include:

  • appoint lead authors rather than chairs of working groups. The lead author should assemble a team fit for purpose, with appropriate representation and use technology to ensure wider participation. The lead author should also be more accountable for the budget for the report
  • write guidance on when the College should produce a report
  • improve the process of reviewing reports
  • abolish paper copies
  • introduce a new system for naming and numbering reports
  • have defined objectives for specific items of work with explicit timeframes

My report is now out for consultation and I would value any comments or feedback. Please send to me at dhart@rcpsych.ac.uk.

 

 

6. Involving patients and carers in the work of the College

Do you know of any patients and carers who would be interested in joining the new College patient and carer forums?

Earlier this year, the College reviewed the patient (and carer) input into the work of the College, not only centrally, but also at Faculty, Section and Divisional level. The main recommendation which emerged from this review, and which was agreed by the Central Executive Committee after much discussion, was to replace the Patients and Carers Committee with a user forum and a carer forum. Each forum will meet individually and will then join up at the end of the day to discuss their findings. We hope that this will contribute to developing policy and support practice.

If you feel that you have a user or carer who would be interested in getting involved and would be interested in contributing to the work of the College, please contact Deborah Hart. There will not be formal interviews, but we will ask people to send a brief CV explaining why they would be interested in joining either the patient or carer forum and what they feel they can contribute. Email: dhart@rcpsych.ac.uk or tel: 020 7235 2351 ext.127.

 

 

7.      Review of CR125 ‘Good Psychiatric Practice: Dr. Elizabeth Fellow-Smith, Chair of the SCPG and Dr. Laurence Mynors-Wallis, Associate Dean – Lead for Revalidation

The Special Committee on Professional Governance and Ethics is embarking on a review of CR125 ‘Good Psychiatric Practice’. This new (3rd) edition will update standards in line with current practice and provide the basis to meet potential requirements for revalidation. The key objectives for the revision are firstly to review the standards, secondly to make the standards objective and measurable as far as possible and thirdly to provide guidance as to what evidence can be gathered to demonstrate that the practice meets the standards set.

We are writing at this early stage to invite your ideas and comments on changes required to the standards and how to measure or evidence practice.It would be most helpful if you can return any comments you have to Charlotte Cox at the College (ccox@rcpsych.ac.uk) by 27th November 2007. The current version of ‘Good Psychiatric Practice’ can be located on the College website.

 

 

8. Sexual Boundary Issues in Psychiatric Settings (Council Report 145, on College website since 22nd August 2007): Professor Sue Bailey, Registrar

CR145 highlights an important, but difficult issue. I am asking for feedback as to how far the recommendations in this report are playing out in your services. I hope to focus on this topic at the 2008 Annual Meeting and am interested over the next few months in taking up any of the themes you think should be included in the Registrar's slot at the conference.

The recommendations are as follows:

  • sufficient numbers of qualified staff must be on duty at all times
  • staff must be regularly supervised
  • ward design should allow sufficient space for patients to be cared for in safety and privacy
  • Trusts should have evidence bases and protocols for treatments
  • clinical staff and managers must develop an understanding of the causes, and recognition, of sexual abuse
  • each psychiatric unit should have a policy and procedures to cover the appropriate expression of sexuality among in-patients. The policy will address human rights, legality, capacity and consent, contraception and cultural variance
  • each unit should have a policy regarding sexual harassment, sexual abuse and rape
  • there should be regular audits of incidents, complaints and allegations, patient attitudes to policies, and staff attitudes and adherence to policies
  • senior management must support training in the prevention, recognition and management of abusive and potentially abusive situations
  • patient information should be readily available

 

 

9. Earlier Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease – estimated GFR and lithium.

Professor Richard Morriss, Professor of Psychiatry and Community Mental Health, University of Nottingham and Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust.

In 2005, the Royal College of Physicians published guidelines on the assessment and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the community1. CKD is graded in 5 stages (5 is endstage CKD). Grade 3 CKD is associated with a 40% increase in cardiovascular mortality in the community when all other cardiovascular risk factors are controlled for 2.

These guidelines promoted the reporting of eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) on routine blood urea and electrolytes because eGFR is a more sensitive indicator of grade 3 CKD than elevated or rising urea and creatinine levels. The detection of grade 3 CKD is important to psychiatrists in particular because we prescribe and monitor a potentially nephrotoxic drug, lithium. We are also increasingly concerned about reducing the risk of cardiovascular mortality in serious mental illness in general. Untreated grade 3 CKD may progress to endstage renal failure but may be reversible by reducing exposure to lithium, and managing hypertension and diabetes mellitus or other risk factors.

An eGFR of 30-59 indicates grade 3 CKD. On routine urea and electrolyte tests, this estimate may be inaccurate in people over 70 years of age, who are black or are otherwise physically unwell. If there are two abnormal eGFRs in 3 months, refer for a specialist opinion if any of the following apply: the patient is less than 55 years old; a rising creatinine on serial tests (even if it is not elevated); persistent proteinuria; any haematuria; signs of anaemia, diabetes, hypertension or known structural urogenital problems.

1. The Royal College of Physicians and Renal Association. The UK Chronic

Kidney Disease Guidelines (2005). http://www.renal.org/CKDguide/ckd.html.

2. Di Angelantonio E, Danesh J, Eriksdottis G, Gudnason V. Renal function and risk of coronary heart disease in general populations: new prospective study and systematic review. PLos Med 2007 (Sept 9); 4 (9): e270.

 

 

10. Images of Psychiatry - £75,000 awarded to Divisional projects

As part of the Images of Psychiatry campaign, bids for funding of projects which support the campaign's objectives were invited from all College Divisions. We received 33 bids with the funding requested totalling almost £260,000. From a central fund of £75,000, allocations were offered to 16 bids with at least one per Division.

The College President, Professor Sheila Hollins, said “The steering group's hopes that the campaign would be adopted locally are being realised and I am looking forward to hearing about progress in the diverse projects being presented at the annual meeting in London next year.”

For a full list of successful bids, click here.

 

 

11. Events

(i) Quality Improvement Network for Multi-Agency CAMHS (QINMAC)

QINMAC aims to facilitate quality improvement and development in 'Tier 2 and 3' CAMHS, through a supportive peer review network. This professionally-led network has completed its second annual audit cycle and will be holding its Annual Forum on 8th November 2007. The forum is a key information-sharing event for existing and potential QINMAC members, other CAMH professionals and commissioners. For more details, please click here or e-mail mcraig@cru.rcpsych.ac.uk

Now approaching its 3rd annual cycle, QINMAC is currently accepting applications for membership. For further information about the benefits of membership and how to join, please visit the project's webpage: www.rcpsych.ac.uk/cru/qinmac.htm

QINMAC is part of the College Centre for Quality Improvement (CCQI).

(ii) College events

(iii) External events

 

© 2007 Royal College of Psychiatrists