|
Recommendation 1: Information
Sharing
The message that needs to be underlined is
that in all circumstances where there is benefit to the service
user in sharing information with other agencies, such as the
police, third sector agencies and probation, then all reasonable
efforts should be made to obtain the consent of the service user to
do so. In the circumstances where the service user withholds
consent, or obtaining consent is not possible, the healthcare team
must then consider the risk to the service user and the wider
public of not sharing the information. The issues considered
and the output of this consideration must be documented in the
service user’s clinical record and risk management plan.
Recommendation 2: Information Sharing
and the police national computer (PNC)
The PNC does have the facility to record core
information about service users about whom the mental health
services have significant concerns if they go ‘absent without
leave’, or fall out of contact with the services. Furthermore,
the PNC can accommodate instructions on what actions to take, and
who to contact, should the service user be stopped by the police in
‘identified circumstances’ and a check made against their identity.
A service user does not have to have any previous criminal record
for this facility to be utilised.
Recommendation 3: Occupational
Therapists and medicines management
A care coordinator, regardless of his/her
professional background, does need to have at least a basic
understanding of the medicines their clients are on and the usual
dose range of these.
Recommendation 4: Client Focused Risk Management Training and Risk
Assessment
Two issues need to be addressed in
client-focused risk assessment training delivered in all mental
health trusts and in documented risk assessment.
The first is the concept of ‘risk
vulnerability’, a concept that was not well understood by all
members of the MHSU’s care team. Furthermore it does not appear to
be routinely included in risk assessment training. In the case of
the MHSU, situational stress increased the patient’s risk
vulnerability but was not a ‘relapse indicator’ per se. The lack of
appreciation of this concept did adversely affect the risk
management plan agreed within his care team.
The second is staff’s awareness of the risks
posed by service users engaged in sports such as karate, kick
boxing, boxing, kung fu etc. When individuals become competent in
any of these sports their hands and feet are considered to be
dangerous weapons. For some of these sports such as kick boxing, it
does not take long for some degree of competency to be achieved as
this case highlights. It is essential that mental health
professionals’ awareness of this is enhanced, as it has real
implications with the process of risk assessment especially where
service users are prone to relapse and hit out with their hands and
feet.
|