|
|
MINDS ON FILM
2/1/2012 9:36:35 AM
Introduction
In Our Name is a low budget feature film, written and
directed by Brian Welsh, which was launched at the London Film
Festival in October 2010 and dedicated to all military service
personnel who end up in prison after trying to return to civilian
life. It was well researched through Welsh’s discussions with
returning soldiers as well as his contact with the charity
Combat
Stress. It tells the story of Suzy, brilliantly played
by Joanne Froggatt, a soldier just returning to her home in a run
down area of the North East of England after a tour of duty in
Iraq. The film follows her struggle to cope with civilian life
again and in particular with the difficulties she has in
reconnecting with her young daughter. It is interesting to note
that the parents of the young girl who acts Suzy’s daughter, are
actually both soldiers in the army. It offers an excellent portrait
of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but also focuses on the
topical issue of guns and mental illness. Unusually, the
protagonist is a female soldier, and In Our Name
highlights the effect that Susie’s PTSD has on both her husband and
her daughter.
|

|
The Film
The film begins with private Suzy and the fellow
soldiers from her unit returning home by train, where she is
welcomed by family and friends at the house she shares with
husband, Mark, who is also a soldier who has previously served in
Iraq, and their daughter, Cass. At first Cass is unwilling to
interact with her mother and Suzy seems able to cope with this
behaviour, until it becomes clear that all is not well in Suzy’s
perception of the world. In the context of some hooliganism in
their impoverished residential area, Suzy starts to develop
paranoia that eventually becomes extreme. Her hypervigilance for
potential dangers is brilliantly portrayed, and permeates
throughout the majority of the film, as she becomes especially
fixated on protecting her daughter. Unable to get close to her
husband and unable to sleep properly, Suzy starts to drink alcohol
in greater amounts.
When her sister invites Suzy and her soldier
colleague, Paul, to attend the primary school where she teaches, in
order to talk to the children about their experiences of war, Suzy
recounts the memory that is haunting her. This revelation explains
the origins of the guilt that Suzy is feeling and the flashbacks
she is suffering as well as providing an understanding of the
importance, for her, of protecting her daughter. As Suzy’s symptoms
of paranoia, flashbacks, hypervigilance, loss of libido and
depression increase, her relationship with husband Mark becomes
ever more strained. Her absence of libido is the trigger for Mark’s
increasing frustration that results in him suspecting that Suzy has
been unfaithful to him. His mental health begins to suffer and his
underlying angry personality traits are revealed, with serious
consequences.
In the final scenes, when Suzy flees with her
daughter and a gun that she has taken from the barracks for
protection, the serious nature of her condition becomes even more
apparent. I do not wish to describe the ending here, but suspect
that it will raise your heart rate.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
As a contemporary portrait of post-traumatic stress disorder,
In Our Name offers a perfect platform to discuss the
diagnosis and management of the condition, with reference to Suzy’s
symptoms and behaviour, and the effect that her condition has on
her close family. The film also depicts the difficulties that some
servicemen may have in seeking help, because they feel doing so may
jeopardise their chances of promotion. For a general
introduction to PTSD, the Royal College of
Psychiatrists has a good factsheet, but for more information about
PTSD related to military combat, the charity Combat
Stress also has lots of information, including some
case
studies.
The other topical issue that is raised by In
Our Name is that of gun possession and mental illness. There
are two aspects of this issue that could be further explored
alongside a viewing of the film. The first is the topic of mentally
ill soldiers carrying guns and the second concerns the process of
licensing guns to the general public who may have had or may
develop a mental disorder. For the first topic, I would recommend a
reading of the recent article published in Advances in Psychiatric
Treatment, in September 2011, by Peter McAllister, Neil Greenberg
& Max Henderson entitled: Occupational psychiatry in the
armed forces: should depressed soldiers carry guns? (vol17,
350-356). The abstract
of this article is freely available. This article describes the
work of the UK Defence Mental Health Services in detail. With
regard to the second issue, most people in the UK will be aware of
the recent
tragic events on New Years Day 2012, in which a middle aged
man, legitimately licensed to hold 6 firearms, with previous mental
health problems, shot dead his partner, her sister and her niece.
This incident has highlighted the growing debate about how gun
licences should be issued and then monitored. The medical
profession currently have no statutory role in the process, but the
BMA is involved in discussions with the Association of Chief Police
Officers about this matter. A statement of the current interim
guidance for doctors on this matter is available at the
BMA
website. The film could provide a good starting point
for a debate on this very important issue.
Perhaps the fact that the film’s ending does not
resolve the outcomes for all of the main characters offers an even
better opportunity to discuss their possible futures. What is left
in no doubt, however, is the detrimental effects that serving in a
war can have on an individual’s mental health and on their close
family relationships and it highlights the importance of having
appropriate care available whenever it is needed.
• More information about In Our Name
is available at IMDB and here is the
link to the official
trailer.
• The DVD can be purchased at
amazon.co.uk.
• Minds on Film is written by consultant
psychiatrist Dr Joyce Almeida.
|
|
1/4/2012 10:39:17 AM
Introduction
Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter....Spring
is a South Korean fiction film, directed by Kim Ki-duk, and
released in 2003. Subtitled in English but with sparse dialogue, it
is 102 minutes in length. It is set almost entirely in a tiny
Buddhist monastery that is located in the middle of a lake, within
the remote forests of Korea, and follows a Buddhist monk through
the cycle of his life. The exquisite cinematography envelopes the
viewer in the beautiful natural scenery of the lake as the five
seasons in the title transform the landscape over the five sections
of the film that cover the different stages of the monk’s life.
In its portrayal of the Buddhist practice of
mindfulness, this film offers the viewer an insight into the
techniques of focusing on the moment and accepting thoughts and
feelings without judgement, both of which are now being used in
Mindfulness-Based
Cognitive Therapy (a therapy that was developed from
the Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction programme of
Jon
Kabat-Zinn) as well as in
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy. I would argue that the process
of watching this film actually offers the viewer some experience of
mindfulness practice. Whilst the intricate details of many actions
are played out in real time, the viewer is forced to follow the
story at a much slower pace than we are often accustomed to
doing.
|

|
The Film
Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter....Spring
begins with the opening of a wooden gate which stands by the
landing stage on the edge of the lake. The crossing of this
threshold is repeated at the start of each season or segment of the
film. A young boy is living with a Buddhist monk on a small
monastery in the middle of the lake, where everything that they
need for daily life must be brought to the island by rowboat. The
seasons in the title represent the ages of this young boy as he
develops from childhood, through his teenage years, to a 30 year
old man fleeing from a crime, then a middle aged monk and finally
as an older monk who repeats the cycle when he takes care of a baby
boy abandoned by its mother.
In the first section of the film there are some
wonderful examples of how the young apprentice is taught empathy
and compassion. On one occasion, after the master finds him
tormenting a fish, a frog and a snake by tying stones to them, the
master ties a small rock to the apprentice’s back at night and
tells him that he must carry this burden until he can free the
creatures that he tormented. The lesson that the apprentice learns
from this teaching stays with him for the rest of his life,
represented visually as a repeating motif throughout the film. As a
teenage apprentice, he encounters a young woman brought to the
monastery by her mother, who is seeking help from the older monk
for symptoms suggestive of depression in her daughter. As the young
woman begins to improve, romance develops between the two teenagers
and the apprentice is consumed with lust. When the young woman
departs the monastery, the apprentice cannot bear the separation
and leaves the monastery too, stealing a statue of the Buddha from
his master. In the following chapter, the master catches sight of a
newspaper report telling that the apprentice has fled after killing
his wife. Soon, the apprentice arrives back at the monastery
seeking asylum. What follows is an interesting scene in which the
older monk tries to manage the young man’s anger and help him to
process the unbearable feelings that he is experiencing. As this is
in process, the police arrive at the monastery to arrest the young
man. After a period in which we imagine he has served his sentence,
and the older monk has ended his life in a ritual manner, the
middle-aged apprentice returns to inhabit the monastery alone and
to devote himself to his practice. In this section of winter, he
seems to use physical exertion as a means of processing the things
that he has done wrong in his past. It is in this cold winter
landscape, in which the lake is literally frozen over, that a
mother, who conceals her identity, delivers her baby boy to the
monastery for the cycle of master and apprentice to begin
again.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) is
increasingly used in therapeutic practice and for anyone interested
in learning about mindfulness, Spring, Summer, Autumn,
Winter....Spring offers the viewer a useful resource. The film
gives some very good examples of the therapeutic benefit that can
come from complete absorption in a task and how this may reduce
anger and arousal. It demonstrates the struggles that people may
face during their lives in dealing with the obstacles that they
encounter and shows the positive effect that acceptance of a
situation may have on an individual. But the stunning setting of
this film also gives us the ability to understand the role of
stillness and focus in meditative practice by offering the viewer a
chance to become totally absorbed in the breathtaking natural
beauty of the lake and its surrounding hills as the scenery changes
through the seasons.
To learn more about Mindfulness Based Stress
Reduction (MBSR), there is an excellent lecture
recorded at Google, in 2007, in which Jon Kabat-Zinn outlines
some of the science surrounding his MBSR programme. In a shorter
interview filmed in 2010, Kabat-Zinn outlines his more
recent and general reflections on mindfulness. For further
information on the application of mindfulness in current
psychiatric and psychological practice, there is much information
available at the website of the Oxford Mindfulness Centre, a UK
based charity working with the therapeutic use of mindfulness to
prevent depression and enhance the emotional quality of our lives.
Founded in 2008, within Oxford University’s Department of
Psychiatry, the centre is involved in training, education, clinical
and neuroscience research in the field of mindfulness. Two members
of the centre, Mark Williams and Danny Penman, have recently
published a book entitled Mindfulness: A Practical Guide to
Finding Peace in a Frantic World (Includes Free CD with Guided
Meditations). There is also a good introductory article called
Mindfulness in psychotherapy: an introduction by
Chris Mace, Consultant Psychotherapist, in Advances in Psychiatric
Treatment (Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2007)13:
147-154).
It is also significant to note that The UK’s
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has
recommended MBCT as a cost-effective treatment for preventing
relapse in depression. The book called Mindfulness-Based
Cognitive Therapy for Depression (Segal, Williams, Teasdale),
published in 2002, has contributed significantly to advancing the
evidence-based therapy for recurrent depression.
I would recommend this film to anyone
interested in understanding the role of mindfulness based therapy
in mental health.
• More information is available about
this film at IMDB, as is a short trailer.
• Spring, Summer, Autumn,
Winter....Spring is available to buy, although it has recently
become unusually expensive, at
amazon.co.uk or it can be rented.
• Minds on Film is written by Consultant
Psychiatrist Dr Joyce Almeida
|
|
12/1/2011 10:15:47 AM
| To mark World Aids day on 1st
December 2011, and the thirty-year anniversary of the first
identified cases, I wish to recommend Longtime Companion,
directed by Norman René, and released in 1989. The title is taken
from the words used by the New York Times obituary section, then
unable to acknowledge a homosexual relationship, to describe a same
sex partner of someone who had died. The film is set during the
1980s, in America, when the world witnessed the emergence of a new
disease that we have come to know as Acquired Immune Deficiency
Syndrome or AIDS, caused by a then unknown agent, now well known as
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 or HIV-1. The film follows several
New York gay men from 1981 until 1989 during which time the disease
emerged and caused death and panic to spread rapidly through the
group. As well as the historical account of a disease that has
emerged in our time, this film is of particular interest to
psychiatrists because it gives us a portrait of AIDS related
dementia in one of the characters. As a final year medical student,
in 1982, I worked on the medical firm at St Thomas’ Hospital when
Terrence Higgins was admitted (the Terrence Higgins
Trust was subsequently founded in his name), and
witnessed my baffled seniors struggle to save him as he declined
rapidly to death from untreatable opportunistic infections. He was
one of the first people to die from AIDS in the UK. I have
never forgotten him. |

|
The Film
Through the interconnected lives of several gay
men, Longtime Companion tells the chronological story of
the beginning of the AIDS epidemic. Within the group, there are two
well established partnerships: that between David and Sean, who
writes a daytime soap opera and that between Howard, who stars in
the soap written by Sean, and his partner Paul. The other single
friends in the circle are Willy, who is a personal trainer, a young
man called John and a lawyer called Fuzzy, on account of his facial
hair. Howard and Paul live next door to Lisa, who is a friend of
Fuzzy and part of the group. Willy and Fuzzy meet early in the film
and begin a relationship. The affluent couple, David and Sean, have
a beach house on Fire Island where they frequently invite their
friends to stay.
In 1981 the New York Times publishes news of a new
‘gay cancer’ called Kaposi’s sarcoma and all of the friends react
in different ways to the report. In 1982, John develops pneumonia,
deteriorates rapidly and dies soon after he is admitted to
hospital. By 1983, the attitude to the illness among the group is
very different and fear has taken hold. David and Sean are seen
arguing over Sean’s fears that he might have the illness. In 1984,
Paul becomes unwell and investigations in hospital reveal that he
has toxoplasmosis. In the same year, Sean is hospitalised and
during a visit to him from Willy, the film demonstrates brilliantly
the fear that Willy has of contracting the disease from a kiss Sean
gives him on the neck.
By 1985, Sean is being nursed at home, by his
partner David, and is now suffering from AIDS related dementia.
David is trying to support Sean with his screenwriting in order to
keep the extent of his illness hidden from the studio. At the same
time Fuzzy tries to secure Howard a movie role when the producer
has refused to cast him after hearing an untrue rumor that he has
AIDS. By 1986, Sean has severe dementia and is bed bound,
incoherent and incontinent. He dies soon after and Fuzzy offers
support to David by phoning to find a ‘gay friendly’ funeral home
that will deal with the body. The next scene, at a memorial
service, takes place in 1987 when we discover the deceased is
David. By 1988, Howard has been diagnosed as HIV positive and is
fundraising for AIDS causes. The film ends in 1989 with Willy,
Fuzzy and Lisa walking along the seashore contemplating how much
their lives have changed, in the few years since AIDS has emerged.
There is a final brief fantasy scene in which all of their lost
friends return to the beach to be fleetingly reunited before
disappearing once again and leaving the three friends alone on the
empty shoreline.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
Longtime Companion presents a number of relevant mental
health issues that are related to infection with the Human
Immunodeficiency Virus. These include the effect of repeated
bereavements on those who lose close friends and or a partner from
the disease; anxiety and panic about developing the illness in
healthy, but at risk, individuals and finally it offers a portrait
of HIV related dementia in one of the characters. As the film is
set at the time when AIDS first manifest, when the mortality rate
was 100%, there is an inevitable historical context to be taken
into account in relation to the medical content.
Thankfully the intervening years have brought huge
success in managing those who suffer from HIV infection, using
highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). As a recent study in
the UK has shown (BMJ 2011;
343:d6016), there is now a significantly improved life
expectancy for those with HIV when antiretroviral therapy is
started soon after diagnosis, transforming it into a chronic
disease rather than what was usually a fatal illness. However
there is still no vaccine or cure and in current times the disease
presents huge problems worldwide, especially in sub-Saharan Africa,
where it is estimated that one in three people are living with the
virus in the worst affected countries. In the UK the estimates
suggest that between 80,000 - 90,000 people are living with HIV and
that the two groups most affected are men who have sex with men and
people who have moved to the UK from areas of the world with a high
incidence of HIV. In this second group, heterosexual sex is the
commonest cause for the spread of infection among men and
women.
Since the mid 1990s, with the use of HAART in the
treatment of those infected with HIV, the incidence of HIV
associated dementia has declined and has been replaced by less
severe HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). The
impairments commonly seen include reduced attention and slower
information processing and subtle changes are estimated to be
present in up to 35% of people with HIV infection who are under the
age of 40. When AIDS dementia does occur, it presents as a
subcortical dementia associated with basal ganglia pathology whose
severity appears to correlate with the levels of virus in the brain
and cerebrospinal fluid. As increasing numbers of HIV positive
people are now living longer, it is important to remember that HIV
is a potential cause of anyone presenting with mild cognitive
impairment or early-onset dementia. For some basic information
about HIV related cognitive impairment, The Alzheimer’s Society has
a good
factsheet on the topic.
Any psychiatrists wanting to consider the subject
area in greater detail might find interest in a book entitled
Handbook of AIDS Psychiatry by M.A. Cohen, H.Goforth, J.
Lux, S. Batista, S. Khalife, K. Cozza, J. Soffer. Oxford University
Press USA. 2010, which was reviewed recently in the British Journal
of Psychiatry by Derek Summerfield, Consultant Psychiatrist
(BJP September 2011 199:259-260). There is also the
earlier Comprehensive Textbook of AIDS Psychiatry Edited
by Mary Ann Cohen & Jack M. Gorman. Oxford University Press.
2007, which was reviewed in 2009 in the British Journal of
Psychiatry by Jose Catalan, Consultant Psychiatrist (BJP 2009
195: 277).
Longtime Companion is a film that puts a
very personal face on the experiences of a close group of gay men
as they struggled to face the frightening consequences of a new
disease, one which proved a challenge to professionals from all
branches of medicine then and, in different ways, is still doing so
today.
• Minds on Film is written by consultant
psychiatrist, Dr Joyce Almeida
• Further information is available at
IMDB, and the
official trailer is
available on You Tube.
• Longtime Companion can be purchased at
amazon.co.uk.
|
|
11/3/2011 10:19:45 AM
|
Matchstick Men, directed by Ridley Scott, was
released in 2003 and is based on the book by Eric Garcia called
Matchstick Men: A novel about Grifters with Issues. It is
a film about confidence tricksters in which the main protagonist, a
con artist called Roy, is convincingly played by Nicolas Cage as a
man who suffers from Tourette’s syndrome and obsessive-compulsive
disorder. There are two themes in this film that run alongside each
other: a clever story of conmen, filled with the expected twists
and an impressive final ‘sting’, and a deeply personal tale of a
man struggling to cope with serious mental illness who is
challenged by the appearance of a teenage daughter he didn’t know
existed. Matchstick Men also presents us with an
interesting portrait of a psychiatrist, Dr Klein, whom Roy visits
for help with his condition. This is a film about deception and
disclosure in various settings and relationships and offers much
for the viewer interested in how we assess the truth about what we
are told.
|

|
The Film
For anyone who hasn’t yet seen the film and doesn’t
want the plot revealed, please do not read on until viewing it.
Matchstick Men opens with Roy, at home,
suffering with his numerous obsessive compulsive symptoms, which
take the form of a need for order and cleanliness and a compulsion
to open and close doors three times, whilst counting aloud, before
he can walk through them. His Tourette’s syndrome consists of a
facial tic involving mostly his left eye and audible grunting. In
the following scenes, we watch Roy and his partner in crime, Frank,
play out a ‘short con’ on an unsuspecting housewife. Roy is exposed
to bright sunlight, when a door is opened to her garden, which
triggers an increase in his facial tics, grunts and then the onset
of a panic attack.
Roy takes regular medication for his symptoms, but
despite this treatment he lives a lonely life and seems unable to
act on a clear attraction, apparently reciprocated, toward a
cashier at his local supermarket. Although Frank is seen to be
generally supportive and tolerant of Roy’s symptoms, he
occasionally finds pleasure in upsetting him by deliberately
defying his need for cleanliness. Matchstick Men creates a
tremendous tone of anxiety for the viewer in the scenes in which
Roy struggles to control his world. His smoking, an attempt to self
medicate, increases as he becomes more stressed and anxious and is
at times almost unbearable to watch, especially in the confined
space of his car.
When Roy accidentally loses the remaining supply of
his psychiatric medication down the waste disposal unit of his
sink, a comic element is briefly added to the film, soon followed
by Roy’s horror and despair when he finds that the doctor, who was
supplying them illegally, has moved away. Without medication, his
symptoms worsen, such that Frank arranges for him to see a
psychiatrist he knows called Dr Klein. In the first meeting with Dr
Klein, Roy begs for just a few tablets. Dr Klein refuses and
insists on a proper assessment, during which Roy reveals that he
has been without an intimate partner since leaving his wife almost
15 years before and that his wife had been pregnant when they
parted. Roy, uncertain as to whether he had been the father of the
baby, becomes curious to know whether he now has a 14 year-old
child. Dr Klein supplies Roy with some different pills, that he
believes will help him to feel much better, and says he will
contact his ex-wife on his behalf. The new pills appear to help
improve all of Roy’s symptoms. After learning that has a daughter,
called Angela, who would really like to meet him, Roy is challenged
by his newfound role as her father and his obsessive-compulsive
disorder is tested to its limits by her visits to his house. As he
struggles to cope with a messy teenager in his life he also becomes
aware of the positive emotional effect that she is having in his
sterile life. Faced with the dilemma of whether he should tell her
the reality about his work, she makes some discoveries in his home,
which force him into telling her the truth.
As Angela learns about her father’s real profession
and the amount of money that he has made from it, she asks to learn
the trade from him. Wanting to keep her presence in his life, he
reluctantly agrees. Caught up in the wish to please Angela, he
reluctantly teaches her how to carry out a simple ‘con’, but forces
her to return the money to the victim after it has been
successfully completed. Frank, by this stage, has persuaded
Roy to carry out a ‘long con’ with him, that promises to extort a
much larger sum of money from a businessman that Frank has met.
Contrary to Roy’s wishes, Angela becomes involved in the final part
of the operation, which goes very wrong. On returning home, Roy and
Angela find the business man holding Frank hostage and he requests
all of the money that Roy has in the house. When Angela goes to get
the money, she returns with a gun and shoots the businessman. Frank
and Angela drive away at Roy’s request before he receives an
unexpected blow to the head from the businessman. As Roy wakes up
in a hospital bed, he is questioned by police officers, but refuses
to answer anything until he can see his psychiatrist. When Dr Klein
arrives at his bedside he whispers the pass code for his bank vault
box and asks that it be given to his daughter. It is only when Dr
Klein has left and no one else returns that Roy gets up and opens
his hospital room to reveal that he is on the roof top of a tall
building and is himself the victim of an audacious sting carried
out by Frank, with the help of a fake daughter, psychiatrist and
businessman. However, one year later, after having lost all of his
money, Roy has found love and marriage with the cashier, who is now
pregnant with their first child. He is also honestly employed as a
carpet salesman and suffers far fewer symptoms.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
The subject of OCD has been covered in my
previous Minds on Film blog about
The Aviator and I would refer readers, wanting more
information about OCD, to that post. In the character of Roy, there
is ample opportunity to examine the day-to-day effect that
obsessive-compulsive disorder might have on an individual and their
relationships. However, Matchstick Men also introduces
viewers to one of the conditions commonly associated with OCD,
Tourette’s syndrome. This is a neurological condition characterised
by involuntary, random sounds and movements, known as tics, which
usually begins in childhood. It is thought that up to 60% of
children with Tourette’s syndrome develop OCD. The tics are often
used to relieve uncomfortable feelings or sensations and many
people are unaware of their tics. In Roy’s case his tics and grunts
are seen to be closely linked to his level of anxiety, something
that is well recognised in sufferers generally. His vulnerability
at the hands of others reminds us of the predicament that many
people with mental illness live with. It is only when Roy has
abandoned his stressful life of crime and finds a meaningful loving
relationship, that he is able to overcome the most distressing
symptoms of both of his disorders.
There is excellent information about all aspects of
Tourette’s syndrome at the
NHS Choices website, including a discussion about the
co-morbidity with OCD and ADHD, and further advice is
available at the website of the charity Tourettes Action.
Medication does have a role in treating some of the symptoms of
Tourette’s syndrome and there are three types of drugs that may be
used: alpha2-adrenergic agonists; muscle relaxants and
neuroleptics. Behaviour therapy is the widely used
non-pharmacological treatment of choice, which can be used alone or
with drugs depending on the severity of the symptoms. Through using
relaxation and a technique called habit reversal many people with
Tourette’s syndrome are enabled to manage their symptoms
better.
I would highly recommend Matchstick Men to
anyone interested in working in Adult Mental Health, whether in
psychiatry, psychiatric nursing, psychology or in any of the
branches of psychotherapy.
• Minds on Film is written by Consultant
Psychiatrist, Dr Joyce Almeida.
• More information about Matchstick
Men is available at IMDB, as well as a
short
trailer.
• The film can be purchased at
amazon.co.uk.
|
|
10/3/2011 3:40:22 PM
Introduction
Like Stars on Earth (Taare Zameen Par in Hindi), is a
Bollywood
movie - the popular name for Hindi-language films that are made in
Mumbai - which was released in the UK in 2007. Characteristic of
most Bollywood films, it is long at 156 minutes and uses songs and
dance, which are relevant to the storyline by offering the
opportunity to explore what may be going on in the mind of a
character or to anticipate an event that has or is about to occur.
The songs may usefully be seen as ‘dream sequences’, which allow
things to happen that are not founded in reality.
The soundtrack is a significant part of the final
product and is often released separately to the film, as it is in
this case, where the CD is enclosed within the DVD box. For a good
introduction to Hindi-language cinema, the British Film Institute
website has an excellent
article by Shyam Benegal.
Like Stars on Earth was produced and
directed by Aamir Khan, who also stars in the film, in a
collaboration with Disney Studios. It tells the story of
undiagnosed dyslexia in a young boy with aspirational middle class
parents. This film was made to educate families in India about
dyslexia and other related conditions such as attention deficit
disorder, as outlined in the panel discussion included in the DVD
extras. Khan, who is a very popular and well-regarded Bollywood
actor, made his directorial debut with Like Stars on
Earth, receiving much critical acclaim.
|

|
The Film
The film opens with Ishaan, an eight-year-old boy,
trying to net some small fish in the water by the side of a street,
oblivious to the waiting school bus nearby. He is delighting in the
task of fishing and completely absorbed in the task. In the next
scene at school, Ishaan gazes out of the window of his classroom,
distracted from the lesson he is in, which gets him into trouble
and it becomes clear that he is repeatedly failing to attend to and
complete his school work. At home, his older brother is a high
achiever, to the clear approval of his aspirational parents. In
contrast, Ishaan is drawn to the world of creativity, with a love
of painting, puzzles and model building, which his brother is alone
in praising. The first song sequence perfectly portrays the
difference between Ishaan’s inner world and that of his striving
goal directed family.
It is only after a series of failures in his class
tests that Ishaan truants from school and gets his brother to fake
the absence note. The head teacher finally makes his parents aware
of the extent of his problems and suggests that he cannot proceed
to the next year. His mother, who has tried to coach him in reading
and writing at home, is frustrated by Ishaan’s apparent lack of
concentration and ability in his studies whilst trying to counter
her husband’s exasperation that Ishaan is being deliberately
stubborn and lazy. As a result, Ishaan is sent away to a strict
boarding school to be ‘sorted out’. Here he continues to fail
academically and Ishaan soon becomes increasingly low in mood and
more withdrawn socially, interacting only with another physically
disabled pupil, who becomes his friend. During this period, he also
loses enthusiasm for his creative activities, which have always
brought him so much pleasure, as he struggles to cope with the loss
of his family and his home environment.
It is only with the arrival of a temporary Art
Teacher at the boarding school, called Ram Shankar Nikumbh, that
there is hope for Ishaan. This teacher uses different methods to
engage the pupils, as illustrated by his introductory song, in
which he introduces himself to the class dressed as a colourful
clown. Nikumbh soon becomes aware that Ishaan is not a happy child
and begins to suspect the true nature of his difficulty. Nikumbh’s
alternative attitudes to learning and his emphasis on creative
freedom eventually engage Ishaan, as he realizes that they share a
similar way of viewing the world that is acceptable. It is through
this bond that Nikumbh eventually reveals he too suffered similar
difficulties as a child, giving Ishaan a positive role model and a
way out of his depression. Gradually, Ishaan’s self-esteem recovers
with the sensitive encouragement of Nikumbh, who highlights
Ishaan’s artistic talents to his parents and headmaster, who are
finally able to be proud of him for his unique achievements.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
As an introduction to the topic of dyslexia, Like Stars on
Earth provides a wonderful case history that highlights not
only the first hand experience of dyslexia in a young child but
also the consequences of a missed diagnosis. Although viewers might
find it hard to believe that Ishaan’s experiences at school could
actually happen in the UK, it is important to recognise how easy it
is for children to be labeled naughty or stupid when, in fact, they
are struggling with dyslexia. As the actress
Greta Scacchi writes, in her recent article for the Evening
Standard newspaper, her son suffered from significant problems as a
result of his dyslexia in the earlier years of his schooling in the
UK, in both the state and the private sector.
The clever use of animation, in the song bheja
kum, provides the viewer with an opportunity to experience
what a dyslexia sufferer may see when they look at a page of print
or numbers and the symbols dance around. As such, it would be a
perfect springboard for a discussion about the symptoms of
dyslexia. But this song sequence, with its fantastical
exaggerations, also offers the viewer an important insight into the
effect on a child of repeatedly failing in their academic studies
and being made to feel stupid and lazy at such a young age. In
turn, it becomes very easy to understand why there is a close
association between dyslexia and both conduct and mood
disorders.
Dyslexia or specific reading disorder is
defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (DSM-IV) as ‘reading achievement (that is, reading
accuracy, speed or comprehension as measured by individually
administered standardised tests) that falls substantially below
that expected given the individual's chronological age, measured
intelligence and age-appropriate education. The disturbance in
reading significantly interferes with academic
achievement … If a sensory deficit is present, the
reading difficulties are in excess of those usually associated with
it.’
According to the Dyslexia Research
Trust, a UK charity, ‘1 in 10 children suffer from dyslexia.
Dyslexia is the most common cause of childhood loss of self-esteem,
leading to profound misery and even suicide, or vandalism, violence
and criminality. 50% of convicted criminals are thought to be
dyslexic’. There is a genetic basis to the condition, as confirmed
by twin studies, which causes differences in the development of the
brain, including microscopic differences in the arrangement and
connection of neurons. These tend particularly to involve visual
and auditory 'magnocellular' systems which are specialised for
rapid information processing. Dyslexia is more common in males than
females and there is often an overlap with attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorders and with dyspraxia. The
film offers an excellent opportunity to consider the issue of
co-morbidity when considering Ishaan’s behaviour at various stages
of the story.
The NHS
choices website has some very informative pages on
dyslexia, with a good discussion of the symptoms, causes and
treatment options. It is interesting to note that brain imaging
studies have shown that people with dyslexia use different parts of
their brain, and that they make more use of the right hemisphere,
which is involved in the more creative aspects of thought. Ishaan’s
story helps to reinforce this different way of engaging with the
world that people with dyslexia often have and that this can be
used to their advantage once the condition has been recognised and
the educational supports are in place. People with dyslexia are
often very good at thinking ‘outside the box’ in an innovative and
creative way. There is further information available about all
aspects of the condition at the British Dyslexia
Association website.
For psychiatrists, there were two excellent
review articles, published in 2010 in Advances in Psychiatric
Treatment, written by child and adolescent psychiatrist Dr
M.S. Thambirajah, entitled Developmental dyslexia: An overview
(Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2010 v. 16, p. 299-307
abstract)
& Developmental dyslexia: clinical aspects (Advances in
Psychiatric Treatment 2010 v. 16, p. 380-387 abstract).
These articles could be read alongside a viewing of Like Stars
on Earth to provide comprehensive learning about dyslexia for
anyone interested in working in Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry.
This post is dedicated to C.P.
Thanks to my colleague Dr S.S. for the film
recommendation
• Further information about Like
Stars on Earth is available at IMDB, as is a short
trailer.
• The film can be purchased at
amazon.co.uk.
• Minds on Film is written by Consultant
Psychiatrist, Dr Joyce Almeida.
|
|
9/1/2011 10:37:27 AM
Introduction
Birdy was released in 1984 and directed by Alan Parker.
It won the Jury’s Special Grand Prix in 1985 at the Cannes Film
Festival and is based on the novel of the same name by William
Wharton. It tells the story of two friends, Birdy and Al, played by
Matthew Modine and Nicolas Cage respectively, who are conscripted
to fight in Vietnam, where they both suffer different degrees of
mental and physical trauma. The film alternates between
scenes after their return from the war, which take place in the
military psychiatric hospital where Birdy is a patient, and the
back-story of the friends’ early life together, told
chronologically in flashbacks. These flashbacks reveal the gradual
development of Birdy’s extremely bizarre behaviour, involving his
preoccupation with birds and flying, which is firmly in place
before he goes to Vietnam. In contrast, the scenes in the
psychiatric hospital reveal how both Birdy and Al have been
affected by their experiences in the war. The film offers a perfect
opportunity to consider the issues of Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder in both characters, and the development of catatonia in
Birdy.
|

|
The Film
The film begins after the friends have returned from the war and
are both in separate military hospitals. Birdy is seen squatting on
the floor of a bare cell looking up at the high window, in a
position suggestive of a bird. Al is returning from surgery to a
ward with his face in bandages, the result of severe burns
requiring skin grafts. Al is soon sent to visit Birdy, at the
request of Birdy’s mother, in the hope that their friendship will
help to entice Birdy out of his bizarre unresponsive, mute state.
Al learns that Birdy was missing in action for a month in Vietnam
before being found and that he has not talked since then. Al starts
trying to communicate with his old friend using their shared
memories. At this point we see the first flashback from their
youth, in which Al catches sight of Birdy squatting high in the
branches of a tree, and learn that the neighbourhood children have
given him the nickname ‘Bird Boy’ or ‘the weird kid’. As the
back-story progresses, Al and Birdy’s unlikely friendship unfolds
as Birdy’s singular passion for birds and flight draws Al in to
many daring and sometimes dangerous ventures.
In the scenes at the psychiatric hospital, Al
becomes more and more frustrated by Birdy’s lack of response, and
his own need to reconnect with his friend becomes increasingly
apparent. Al chooses to withhold the important information about
Birdy’s background from Dr Weiss, the psychiatrist, wanting to keep
the things that they did together private. The flashbacks begin to
reveal the development of Birdy’s increasingly strange and abnormal
behaviour as he is seen trying to live in the pigeon coop like his
birds, and later when he strips naked to sleep in the large
birdcage with his female canary, whilst he experiences some erotic
fantasies centered on his pet. As well as this, Birdy’s social
isolation and lack of interest in any intimate human sexual
relationship is brilliantly portrayed when Birdy’s parents force
him to go to the school prom with a date. It later becomes clear
that Birdy believes that he will fly one day, using his own muscle
power, and that he can learn to talk to his pet birds. In fact in
one conversation with Al, Birdy states that he saw himself fly one
night and believed that he was a bird.
As Al becomes more angry and agitated by his
inability to connect with Birdy, we learn that he suffers from
flashbacks of the events that injured him, which occur during his
sleep and that wake him, drenched in sweat. He doesn’t want anyone
to know that he is suffering in this way, but it becomes clear that
Al is struggling to maintain his own mental health. After having no
success in helping Birdy to speak again, Dr Weiss threatens to send
Al away, but Al makes one final request of the psychiatrist, that
he hopes might trigger Birdy’s memory of their past friendship. By
this time, Al is desperate for Birdy’s friendship and conversation
and the breakthrough comes as Al tells him, in tears, how awful he
is feeling. As Al sits holding Birdy close to him on the floor of
his cell, he is astonished when Birdy says “Al sometimes you’re so
full of s**t”. When Al asks him why he decided to talk, he replied
“I didn’t, it just happened”. The ending of the film must be left
for the viewer to experience.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
This film provides an excellent opportunity to
discuss the development of a catatonic schizophrenic illness in a
young man, from his pre-morbid schizoid personality to his episode
of mute posturing in the pose of a bird, triggered by his
experiences of war. It also offers a platform to consider the
effects of traumatic war experiences on both young men.
As catatonic schizophrenia has become less common
in our society, perhaps because there is earlier intervention and
effective drug treatment for schizophrenia now available,
Birdy provides a very important opportunity for students
of all mental health professions to gain an understanding of the
condition. Catatonia is defined as a disturbance of motor behaviour
that may have a psychological or neurological cause. In its most
well known form, the individual may remain fixed and immobile in a
bizarre and uncomfortable position for a lengthy period of time
lasting days or even longer. It can also present with agitated
hyperkinetic behaviour. Catatonia, as a symptom, is associated with
a variety of mental disorders, only one of which is schizophrenia.
Other conditions associated with the symptom are brain disease,
mood disorders, drugs, alcohol and metabolic disturbances.
As outlined in the ICD-10 classification of mental
disorders, the diagnosis of catatonic schizophrenia is indicated if
there is pronounced psychomotor disturbance present, with a marked
decrease in reactivity to the environment. Bizarre postures may be
held for lengthy periods of time and mutism may be a feature. The
other features of schizophrenia, such as delusions and
hallucinations may also be present, but if a person is mute, this
will not always be possible to assess at the time of presentation.
The film provides a superb understanding of the importance that
past history plays in unraveling the possible causes of mutism.
Because Al withholds this important information from the
psychiatrist, there is no possibility of Dr Weiss understanding the
context in which Birdy has become unwell.
For further information about schizophrenia, the
Royal College of Psychiatrists website has some useful
pages.
Of particular interest in this film is the fact
that the story is not just about Birdy’s mental illness, but also
about the effects on Al of his traumatic experiences in Vietnam. He
is seen to develop some of the symptoms of post-traumatic stress
disorder. This provides an additional platform for considering the
topic of PTSD, perhaps alongside a reading of the information at
the
Royal College of Psychiatrists website on the condition.
The
NHS choices website also has an informative video
featuring the personal account of a victim of the 7th July London
bomb blast.
I would recommend this film for anyone interested
in general adult mental health and in particular for learning about
the development of a schizophrenic illness.
• Minds on Film is written by Consultant
Psychiatrist Dr Joyce Almeida.
• Further information about Birdy is
available at IMDB, as is a short
trailer.
|
|
8/1/2011 10:05:15 AM
Introduction
Private Property, or Nue Propriété, is a film
in French with English subtitles, co-written and directed by
Belgian director Joachim Lafosse and released in the UK in 2008. It
stars Isabelle Huppert, as Pascale, who gives an excellent
portrayal of a single mother struggling to parent her adult twin
sons, played by brothers Jérémie and Yannick Renier. The film is an
intimate family portrait of the aftermath of divorce ten years
previously, showing how each family member has been affected.
Private Property explores the vulnerable position of
children caught up in the post divorce hurt and anger that can
continue indefinitely if both parents remain confrontational in
their quest to win the allegiance of their children. But the film
also considers the issue of personal boundaries between siblings,
parents and their young adult children, giving it a particular
interest to psychotherapists working with families or individuals
who have experienced divorce, in an age when an increasing number
of children remain in the family home well into their twenties.
|

|
The Film
The film opens with Pascale trying on a negligee in
front of her bedroom mirror and calling for one of her twenty
year-old sons, François, who appears wearing only his underpants
and a t-shirt, to give her his opinion about how she looks. They
are soon joined by his twin, Thierry, similarly dressed, who makes
some jokingly crude and hurtful comments about his mother. From
this first scene we understand immediately the difficult and
disrespectful relationship that exists between Pascale and her
sons. As we watch her prepare meals for them, which her sons always
eat ravenously whilst criticising everything she says, it becomes
apparent that Pascale has no parental control over them, but
especially over Thierry’s angry bullying behaviour. When she
returns home from work one day to find her ex husband in the house
with their sons, she becomes enraged and asks him to see them
elsewhere, frustrated by the intrusion into her personal space
which so undermines her authority. Filmed with slow static takes
that perfectly capture the claustrophobic atmosphere within the
rooms of the home, Private Property painfully portrays the
intense emotional interactions between the twin brothers and their
mother.
Private Property shows the difficult job
of a single mother, dependent on the financial support of her ex
husband, struggling to make things good for her sons without the
balance and support of another adult partner in the home. Her
devotion to her sons has been her major focus for the ten years
since the divorce until she begins to recognise the need to focus
on her own life again. We learn that she is having a secret
relationship with her neighbour, Jan, a cook who wants her to sell
up the family home and move away with him to open up a B & B.
She gradually builds the courage to tell her sons this plan, but
they are so shocked at the prospect of a change to their lives that
they completely forbid a sale of the house, which they remind her
was bought by their father for them. Thierry meets with his father,
Luc, to inform him of Pascale’s plan and is reassured by him that
she will not be allowed to sell the house. However, François
reflects on the possibility of actually helping his mother and Jan
in the B & B, revealing a difference between the brothers in
their relationships with Pascale. Throughout the film we are shown
scenes of the brothers playing table tennis and computer games or
lounging in front of the TV whilst waiting for Pascale to feed
them.
Desperate for some adult support in regaining
parental authority in the discussion about her future, Pascale
invites her lover Jan to supper. He cooks the family a special meal
and is rewarded by rudeness from Thierry and disinterest in eating
his food. Soon after, Jan tells Pascale that she must sort out her
relationship with her sons before he can see her again and she
becomes more isolated than ever. The brothers start to argue more
frequently between themselves, and with their mother, causing the
family to finally disintegrate when Pascale leaves home in search
of some space for herself, unable to cope with Thierry’s
behaviour.
I will not describe the end scenes in any detail,
except to say that they reveal the ultimate emotional vulnerability
and immaturity of Thierry, whose anger finally causes great damage
to the family. We come to understand that there has been a
catastrophic failure in helping him to process the deep hurt and
loss that he experienced as a result of his parents divorce and
that he has continued to suffer as a result of their ongoing poor
relationship. Perhaps appropriately for the subject matter, the
film concludes without resolution.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
Private Property provides us with a window on the world
of the post divorce family ten years from their break up and gives
us an opportunity to reflect on the harm of continuing conflict
between divorced parents over many years. The film is especially
good at illustrating the damaging effects that an acrimonious
divorce can have on older children, particularly when their
divorced parents continue to undermine each other as they fight for
the allegiance of their children. Because Luc has bought the
farmhouse for his sons and ex wife, he remains essentially in
control of the family, depriving Pascale of any freedom to move on.
Her dilemma is very well performed by Huppert as the downtrodden,
impoverished, exhausted single mother who is trying too hard to put
her sons needs first, trapped by the role that she has played in
creating their inconsiderate selfishness, whilst unable to realise
her own desired future.
Private Property might also be of
particular interest to psychotherapists, working with families or
individuals, as a focus for discussion about the role of
inter-personal boundaries within relationships. Indeed the film
opens with a dedication “To our boundaries”, setting the
psychological agenda that will be explored. The close bond that is
presented between the twin brothers, as we watch them shampooing
each other’s hair in a shared bath, gives rise to uncomfortable
feelings of an inappropriate inter-personal boundary between the
siblings, characterised by inadequate emotional separation from
each other and from their mother. Later on in the film we witness
the dangerous consequences of that inadequate separation. In the
opening scene in which Pascale asks François for his opinion of her
newly purchased undergarment, we are in equally uncomfortable
territory, as we witness a sexualised conversation between a mother
and her adult sons. As a training exercise for those wanting to
work with families in distress as a result of divorce, this film
offers a wealth of opportunities for observing both verbal and
non-verbal interactions that point to the difficulties each family
member is experiencing.
For further reading, The Royal College of
Psychiatry website has a good
factsheet on the effect that separation and divorce of
parents may have on children and young people, in their Mental
Health and Growing Up series. The website Divorce Aid also has a
number of relevant pages for
teenagers. As such, this film could be used as a springboard
for discussions about the effects of divorce on the mental health
of children for medical students and psychiatric trainees.
• Further information about Private
Property can be found at IMDB.
• The DVD can be purchased at
amazon.co.uk., but only from third party sellers. However it is
available to rent from various sources.
• Minds on Film is written by
Consultant Psychiatrist Dr Joyce Almeida 7/4/2011 2:49:21 PM
Introduction
Sharing the Secret was made as a television drama in
the United States in 2000 and first released in the UK on DVD in
2003. It received a Peabody
award in 2001 for the accuracy of its portrait of a
teenager in crisis. Directed by Katt Shea, with perceptive
performances from its cast, it explores the subject of bulimia
nervosa in a high achieving teenage girl, Beth, whose parents
divorced a few years earlier. Offering a wonderful platform for a
discussion about eating disorders in general, it could also be used
to explore the differential diagnoses that may be associated with
the symptom of binge eating. Of additional interest is the fact
that Beth’s mother, Dr Nina Moss, is a child psychologist who
treats children suffering from emotional difficulties as a result
of divorce but who is unable to detect the early signs of emotional
difficulty in her own daughter.
|

|
The Film
The film opens with teenager Beth having breakfast
in a restaurant with her father John, who is remarried and has a
young son. Beth excuses herself to go to the toilet, looking
tense and upset. We next see her in the flat, where she lives with
her mother Nina, as Beth is doing homework w ith a friend. Her
mother comes home hungry that evening and is unable to find a
portion of Chinese food that she had stored in the fridge. Beth
tells her that she had thrown it out because the smell made her
feel sick. Nina comments to Beth that she has grown ‘tall and
skinny’ and Beth replies that she likes looking that way. These
first few minutes set the scene for the story that unfolds,
introducing the suspicion of something secretive about Beth’s
behaviour concerning food and that she has a particularly acute
focus on her own body image.
Beth is a bright and able student who has a passion
for ballet. She is struggling to fit in with her peers, who are all
preoccupied to some extent with their body appearance and the world
of dating. At a friend’s party, Beth actively sabotages the
approaches of a boy and in the following scenes she is seen to
avoid eating, always giving a seemingly plausible reason for her
abstinence, until we are eventually shown her binging secretly on a
large amount of food before making herself vomit.
Her father wants to integrate Beth more fully into
his new family and invites her to stay over at his house for a
weekend, something that she has not done since his remarriage. In a
particularly poignant scene, during the first sleepover, her father
tells Beth that she is gorgeous and then says “I wish I’d frozen
you at 10, you’re growing up so fast”. Beth, clearly upset by this,
denies that she is growing up. In contrast, Beth’s mother does not
have a new partner but works long hours as a child psychologist.
She and Beth appear to have an overly close, loving relationship in
which Nina even shares certain details about her patients. Indeed,
Nina’s therapy sessions with one young girl, Rachel, are shown in
some detail. The film portrays Nina’s attempts to ‘give Rachel a
voice’, to express the difficult feelings she has in her father’s
newly blended family. This storyline contrasts brilliantly with
Beth’s reality in which her parents seem to have worked hard to
avoid any openly expressed negative emotions about their
separation, although animosity simmers just below the surface.
This, in turn, has left Beth trying hard to please them both with
her compliant behaviour and high academic achievements.
Beth’s secretive bulimic behaviour finally comes to
light as her physical health deteriorates and she collapses at
school. Forced into therapy by her mother, Beth initially rebels
but then begins to engage with the therapist, allowing her to
acknowledge her illness. It is only then that she asks for some
inpatient help, as she recognises the need to get some distance
from both her mother and her father. In a brilliant scene between
Beth and Nina, in which Nina describes the shame and guilt that she
is having to bear, Beth shouts out angrily “ It’s not about
you....it’s about me”. The film ends with Beth beginning to make
progress in the inpatient unit but with more still to achieve,
viewers must decide how they feel about her future.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
As a clinical case study, Sharing the
Secret presents a very good portrait of bulimia nervosa and
provides an excellent presentation of some of the underlying
psychological issues that may play a part in the genesis of an
eating disorder in the teenage years. The film also offers an
opportunity for discussing the difficulties that may be encountered
in trying to engage sufferers in any form of psychological therapy.
Sharing the Secret could also be used for teaching
students about the wider effects that an eating disorder, in one
family member, can have on others in the family. In particular, it
explores the painful struggle of a mother who is forced to cope
with the guilt she feels about failing to recognise her own
daughter’s eating disorder.
There is a useful, detailed discussion on the topic
of bulimia and binge eating in an article by Zaffra Cooper and
Christopher G. Fairburn, in Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
(2009) 15: 129-136 entitled Management of bulimia nervosa and
other binge eating problems (abstract).
This article was a revision of a paper by Christopher G. Fairburn
with the same title, published in Advances in
Psychiatric Treatment (1997), vol. 3, pp. 2-8, now
freely available in its entirety. Beth clearly presents the three
cardinal features required for the diagnosis of bulimia nervosa;
frequent binges of large amounts of food; the use of vomiting,
fasting and or exercise to control shape and weight, and, lastly,
an extreme focus and concern about weight and body shape, indeed a
fear of being fat, bound up closely with a low self-worth. All of
this occurs without excessive weight loss.
Further information can be found on
eating
disorders at the Royal College of
Psychiatrists website as well as a
leaflet on anorexia and bulimia. The
NHS
choices website has a good short video featuring
consultant psychiatrist Professor Janet Treasure, from the eating
disorder unit at South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, discussing
bulimia.
CBT for the treatment of bulimia nervosa has a good
evidence base and there is an interesting article discussing the
use of CBT for a variety of conditions when working with young
people and their families, entitled Cognitive-behavioural
therapy with children, young people and families: from individual
to systemic therapy in Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
(2010) 16: 23-36 (abstract)
written by consultant psychiatrist Nicky Dummett.
With its excellent portrait of an eating disorder
in a teenager, I would definitely recommend Sharing the
Secret to anyone interested in working in the field of child
and adolescent psychiatry regardless of their discipline. This film
may also be of interest to sufferers and their families.
• More information about Sharing
the Secret can be found at IMDB.
• The DVD can be purchased at
amazon.co.uk.
• Minds on Film is written by
consultant psychiatrist Dr Joyce Almeida
6/1/2011 8:21:50 AM
Introduction
Released in the UK in 2005, The Machinist was directed
by Brad Anderson and stars Christian Bale in one of the most
committed performances to be seen in cinema. Bale loses so much
weight for the part of Trevor Reznik, more than 4 stones in a
matter of months, that his skeletal form is almost too difficult to
watch at times. The film opens with the main protagonist, Reznik,
in an extremely disturbed state of mind, seemingly disposing of a
body rolled in carpet. What follows is the back-story to this
scene, as we learn that Reznik has suffered from a year of crushing
insomnia and dramatic weight loss. The film ends with us
understanding the cause of his initial insomnia and the subsequent
development of his paranoid psychosis. With a tagline to the film
that states ‘A little guilt goes a long way...’ we find ourselves
firmly in the realm of psychiatric illness for the whole of the 98
minutes and it gives the viewer an opportunity to experience the
confusing and frightening world of paranoia at close quarters. The
screenplay was written by Scott Kosar, who states that he was
influenced by Dostoyevsky’s
The Double: A Petersburg Poem, a short novel that describes the
inner struggle of its protagonist, who starts seeing his double
everywhere, as his mental state deteriorates. It is worth
mentioning that some scenes in The Machinist are
disturbing, despite it being rating as a 15.
|

|
The Film
I do not intend to reveal the entire plot of The
Machinist, but wish to consider the way in which the film
provides us with suggestions about Reznik’s mental state. This
begins with the choice made by the director, throughout most of the
film, to use a cinematic atmosphere of low light and grimy
surroundings, which contribute to an overall tone of hopelessness
and despair. The musical score also reinforces what we see of
Reznik’s fearful, persecutory state of mind for much of the film.
But it is the gaunt, haunted skeletal appearance of Bale himself
who manages to convey the complexity of his character, racked with
guilt, denial and increasing persecutory anxieties, that makes this
an extraordinary visual account of a mental illness unfolding
before our very eyes.
After the initial opening scene described
above, we learn that Trevor Reznik is single and works as a machine
operator at the local factory. We discover that he visits a
prostitute, called Stevie, regularly and that he is a friend to her
as much as a client. Early in the film, she is clearly concerned
about both his weight loss and his distracted mental state and
suggests that he see a doctor. However, he refuses to seek help of
any kind. The management at his workplace also express concern
about his weight loss and mental state, asking him if he is ‘doing
drugs’. To them he states that he has got a lot on his mind, but
he’s dealing with it.
His distracted mental state then leads to an
awful accident at his work in which a colleague loses a limb,
resulting in the other workers turning against Reznik for his
‘weird’ state of mind. His paranoia in this context appears real
and justified. In the investigation of the incident, Reznik
confesses to having been distracted by another worker, called Ivan,
leading him to discover that there is no such person employed by
the factory. However, Ivan continues to pursue Reznik, who begins
to feel increasingly persecuted. He begins to neglect his
day-to-day responsibilities and personal care and in a downward
spiral of despair also loses his job. But he continues to turn to
Stevie as someone he can trust until, finally, she too becomes a
part of his persecutory world and she throws him out of her flat. A
parallel storyline, with particular significance to the film,
concerns Reznik’s late night trips to the airport coffee bar where
he has become well known to the waitress there who works the night
shift. Interestingly, these scenes are bathed in light and seem to
offer some temporary way out of the darkness for Reznik.
As the film progresses the boundary between
truth and delusion becomes completely blurred for Reznik and the
viewer. Certain everyday objects, like the cigarette lighter in his
truck, appear to take on a special significance only understandable
after the final scenes of the film. We are not sure what to believe
until we are given several clues that Ivan is in fact a part of
Reznik himself, hounding him until he finally makes the right
choice about something he has done. Only when he takes full
responsibility for his earlier action does he get any resolution of
his guilt and can at last fall into a deep sleep. The film
provides us with the final piece of the psychological puzzle at its
very end but some viewers may have managed to collect enough clues
before then to reach the correct conclusion for themselves.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
For any professional engaged in carrying out mental state
assessments, this film offers the opportunity to enter the
persecutory world of an individual and to experience the blurring
of boundaries between truth and delusion that so disturbs people
suffering from a paranoid psychosis. An excellent article on
paranoia, entitled Helping patients with paranoid and
suspicious thoughts: a cognitive–behavioural approach by Daniel
Freeman and Philippa Garety ( Advances in
Psychiatric Treatment (2006) 12: 404-415) could be read
alongside a viewing of this film for enriched learning.
The Machinist offers not only a
brilliant springboard to teach about the experience of paranoia but
also presents the opportunity to consider the differential
diagnosis in someone who presents with such symptoms and to examine
the predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating factors that might
be used in constructing a psychodynamic formulation. Further
discussion about psychodynamic formulations is available in a
two-part article published in Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
entitled Teaching of psychodynamic formulation to psychiatric
trainees (2005) 11:
416-423 and (2006) 12:
92-99 both by Chris Mace and Sharon Binyon.
With regards to Reznik, one could suggest that
his premorbid personality, shaped perhaps by the absence of his
father from a young age, coupled with his single status and lack of
intimacy, has predisposed him to develop a depressive episode, in
which he suffers from extreme anorexia and chronically impaired
sleep, which in turn further impair his cognitive functions. We
come to understand that the trigger for his illness was his spur of
the moment decision to flee from a traumatic event generating huge
guilt. His depression steadily worsened over a year without any
professional help, until he develops a severe psychotic depressive
episode with mood congruent paranoid delusions, visual
hallucinations and second person auditory hallucinations. I suggest
that Ivan represents a projection; the mental mechanism described
by psychoanalysts whereby a person attempts to get rid of
unacceptable impulses or parts of the self by externalising
them.
The Machinist could also offer a
platform for discussion about the topic of insomnia and chronic
sleep deprivation. A very good and broad introduction
to the topic of insomnia and its causes can be found on the NHS
choices website. It is important to note that although Reznik
states that he hasn’t slept for a year, we actually watch him
having a brief lapse into sleep that lasts a few seconds one night.
In reality, the sleep deprivation record is thought to stand at 266
hours (a little over 11 days) achieved on live webcam in 2007 by a
43 year old Cornishman called Tony Wright, as this
BBC report describes. The Guinness Book of Records stopped
acknowledging attempts at sleep deprivation prior to his
achievement because of the negative consequences for health.
The Machinist could definitely be
used to teach students from various backgrounds about persecutory
delusions and abnormal perceptions and it illustrates the
importance of obtaining an independent history from an informant,
whenever possible, when interviewing someone suffering from
paranoid symptoms. I would recommend this film for anyone seeking
to work in adult mental health.
Finally, after mentioning the first national
medical film festival, Medfest 2011, in my last post, I was
fortunate to attend the St George’s event as a panellist. The three
contrasting films shown made for a very interesting evening of
viewing and discussion, one of which, called Shadow Scan,
tells the harrowing story of an over stressed, drug addicted and
depressed, self-harming junior doctor. Written and directed by
doctor turned filmmaker, Tinge Krishnan, Shadow Scan won a
BAFTA in 2001. Lasting ten minutes, it is available to watch on
YouTube and could definitely be considered alongside The
Machinist in a discussion about the filmic techniques used to
create an atmosphere of despair and depression in a character.
Shadow
Scan can be viewed in its entirety here and for
anyone interested in hearing more about the festival, there is an
excellent review at the
Lancet online, May 18, 2011.
• More information about The
Machinist can be found at IMDB as can a short
trailer.
• The DVD can be purchased at
amazon.co.uk
• Minds on Film is written by Dr
Joyce Almeida
5/4/2011 9:18:43 AM
Introduction
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, released in 2007, was
directed by Julian Schnabel and is based on the book of the same
name. The film won a Bafta for best screenplay, a Golden Globe and
an award for best director at Cannes Film Festival. In French with
English subtitles, it tells the true story of Elle magazine
editor-in-chief, Jean-Dominique Bauby, who suffered a brain stem
cerebrovascular accident at the age of forty-three. He consequently
developed locked-in syndrome, a rare neurological condition
characterised by quadriplegia and an absence of verbal
communication but with preservation of eye movements and intellect.
Bauby’s book was dictated by the blinking of his left eye in
response to a translator who would recite the letters of the
alphabet, a task requiring an extraordinary amount of patience, and
it tells the story of his experiences from the moment he regained
consciousness in hospital. The book was published in France in
March 1997, ten days before Bauby died of pneumonia. Unusually for
a film, we spend a great deal of time seeing things solely from
Bauby’s direct perspective. This makes The Diving Bell and the
Butterfly a particularly instructive experience for any mental
healthcare professional seeking to better their empathic
skills.
|

|
The Film
The film opens with the blurry opening of Bauby’s eyes as he
regains consciousness in a hospital room. We find ourselves sharing
his view of the world as he wakes up to his new surroundings. We
hear his internal voice attempt to answer the first questions from
staff before realising that they cannot hear him because he cannot
speak aloud. Very rapidly, his struggle to be understood becomes
the viewer’s struggle as we are quite literally trapped inside his
head. From his personal viewpoint, we experience the various
professionals who come to help him, some better than others at
empathizing with him. In this context, we can feel the relief when
a speech and language therapist brings him a method that she
believes will help him to communicate. Initially negative, Bauby
soon finds a positive outlook on his situation and states that;
“apart from my eyes, two things aren’t paralysed…my imagination and
my memory”. In his mind, these are the two things symbolically
represented by the Butterfly, which remain free to roam, whereas
his body he represents as a Diving bell, in which his mind is
trapped.
All of the devices used in filming succeed in putting us firmly
in the protagonist’s place and this is the only viewpoint we are
given for the first 15 minutes of the film before we begin to see
Bauby from the outside, as a separate person. This technique has
the effect of trapping us inside his body too, until we are
released and able to view the world from our usual (in film,
multiple) perspectives. This moment occurs for him and us at the
point at which he is taken from his room for the first time and
wheeled down a corridor, seeing his image reflected in a pane of
glass as he is taken to a balcony and the fresh air. From this
point on, we move between his perspective of the world and our
own.
The fact that Bauby must rely solely on his left eye to
communicate, and that he manages to express so much with it,
reminds us of just how much can be transmitted by non-verbal cues
in people with poor or non existent verbal speech. But most
impressive of all is the real time experience we are given of the
blinking alphabet dictation method that allows his thoughts to be
heard and his book to be written. We are left in no doubt as to the
enormous effort, determination and perseverance that was required
to bring this story to its audience.
As well as his progress in the hospital, the film pieces
together some of Bauby’s life before his cerebrovascular accident,
with the help of intermittent flashbacks. One such flashback allows
us to see the tender and close relationship he has had with his
ageing father, which sets the scene for a particularly moving
moment later on when his father phones him in hospital and tries to
talk through his translator about his deepest feelings. Throughout
the film he receives a series of visits from friends and family,
each revealing a different reaction to his appearance and to the
communication difficulty. One friend, who had been held hostage in
Beirut for four years, sees a similarity between his own experience
of confinement and Bauby’s entrapment in his body advising him to
“hold fast to the human inside of you and you’ll survive”. His
mistress is unable to visit him in contrast to the mother of his
children, from whom he is separated, so that the film is also about
the different reactions that his loved ones have to his
condition.
Relevance to the field of Mental Health
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly offers the viewer a clinical
case study of a rare neurological condition called locked-in
syndrome. It presents us with a patient centered view of the
extraordinary experience involved in living with such a disability
whilst highlighting his experience of the professionals he
encounters. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly is already
recommended viewing for speech and language therapy students, but I
believe it should be seen as widely as possible by anyone who cares
for patients with any degree of impaired speech and movement, some
of who find themselves within the mental health care services.
In particular, the film reminds healthcare professionals of our
responsibility to treat every individual in our care with respect
and dignity, using our empathic skills to put ourselves in others
shoes, whether or not they can speak to us or communicate their
thoughts effectively. The film is very good at demonstrating how
small actions by a care assistant can have a huge effect on Bauby,
when one turns on the TV, which is showing children’s cartoons, as
she leaves his room, and another turns off the TV when it is
showing a football game that Bauby is actually enjoying enormously.
In both cases, he is powerless to get his needs met. These scenes
might offer a perfect starting point for teaching students from a
variety of backgrounds about how to develop empathy in a
therapeutic setting.
For anyone wanting more detailed clinical information about this
condition, it is discussed in a review article published in the BMJ
in 2005 (Smith E, Delargy M. Locked-in syndrome. BMJ 2005; 330:
406-09). For another excellent patient centered account of
locked-in syndrome and the distinction between it and persistent
vegetative state, the BMJ published a very good clinical review, in
2005, written by a young man called Nick Chisholm, who suffered a
series of brain stem cerebrovascular accidents after suffering
concussion during a rugby match. As both the articles explain,
locked in syndrome is caused by a lesion in the brain stem,
commonly caused by a vascular incident, trauma or by extensive
demyelination which affects the brain’s peripheral connections. As
such, I would highly recommend this film for anyone interested in
neuropsychology or neuropsychiatry.
At a time when the topic of teaching medical students empathic
skills is being increasingly discussed, this film offers one of the
best opportunities yet for stepping in to a patient’s shoes and
experiencing life from the other side of the bed.
Any medical students interested in exploring the relationship
between medicine and film further, may want to visit one of the
many free events taking place, during May, at locations around the
UK as part of Medfest 2011,
the first national medical film festival, whose theme is ‘the Image
of Doctors’.
* More information about The Diving Bell and the Butterfly can
be found at IMDB
as can a short trailer
.
* The DVD is available on
amazon.co.uk.
* Minds on Film is written by Dr Joyce Almeida.
|
About This Blog
Minds on
Film
is a monthly blog that
explores psychiatric conditions and mental health issues as
portrayed in a selection of readily available films.
Please note that this blog may contain
plot spoilers. Any views expressed are purely my own.
.jpg)
Dr Almeida is a consultant
psychiatrist working in the private sector in the UK.
Archive
June 2010 (1)July 2010 (1)August 2010 (1)September 2010 (3)October 2010 (1)November 2010 (1)December 2010 (1)January 2011 (1)February 2011 (2)March 2011 (1)April 2011 (1)May 2011 (1)June 2011 (1)July 2011 (1)August 2011 (1)September 2011 (1)October 2011 (1)November 2011 (1)December 2011 (1)January 2012 (1)February 2012 (1)
|