When replying to this correspondence it is essential to use the
reference MS/AW
27 February 2004
Kevin Mantle
Mental Health Policy & Performance
315 Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
LONDON SE1 8UG
Dear Mr Mantle
re: 'Delivering Race Equality: a Framework for Action'
The Royal College of Psychiatrists was grateful to receive a
copy of this consultation document setting out the Government’s
plans for improving mental health services for people from black
and minority ethnic communities.
The document has been circulated very widely within the College –
to our Special Committee on Ethnic Issues, Transcultural Psychiatry
Special Interest Group, Special Committee of Patients and Carers,
to the Executive and Finance Committee, and to the College’s
Council, the membership of which includes representatives of all
our specialist Faculties and Sections and geographical
Divisions.
The College strongly welcomes the Framework for Action, which
is consistent with the College’s *Race Equality Scheme – an area of
work which is of high priority within the College. Our Race
Equality Statement of Intent and Scheme were developed by the
Special Committee on Ethnic Issues and endorsed by Council in 2002,
and an Action Plan was devised last year to guide the
implementation of the Scheme.
(*Details of the College’s Race Equality Scheme are available
on the
College’s website. nb We are
currently in the process of expanding the College’s website to
include more extensive information about our Race Equality strategy
and Action Plan.)
The Royal College of Psychiatrists looks forward to working
closely with NIMHE in relation to the implementation of the
Department of Health’s Framework for Action. We would be very
interested to receive details of the responses to the consultation
if the Department is willing to share these with us.
Detailed comments on the Framework from the College’s Forensic
Psychiatry Faculty are attached.
Yours sincerely
Dr Mike Shooter
President
enc
'Delivering Race Equality: a Framework for Action'
Comments from the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Forensic
Psychiatry Faculty
Consultation Points 2, 3and 4:
In regard to forensic psychiatry, there are a number of
specific issues.
1. The problem with discrimination as described in this
document is very much couched in terms of problems between the
white UK majority and ethnic minorities. Within medium secure
units, the problems are, however, considerably more complex. Within
a relatively small unit, there may be patients drawn from a number
of different ethnic minorities. There can be significant tension
between different members of different ethnic minorities which are
just as powerful and important as tensions between the white UK
majority and a generic grouping of ethnic minorities. This is a
complex and sensitive area but does need acknowledgement.
Otherwise, the scenario becomes a crude white/black one. There can
also be tensions between different ethnic groups within the staff
group made more complex by that staff group having responsibility
for a multi-ethnic patient group. The latter is reported as an
increasing problem
2. In some medium secure units, white patients are in the
minority and there needs to be an understanding of white experience
as well as that of the minority ethnic groups.
3. Within forensic services where patients have been drawn
from a number of different cultural and ethnic backgrounds,
implementing this guidance may be impossible. It could lead to
impotence on the part of the staff in that the mental health worker
may feel that they cannot engage with a particular patient because
they do not share their ethnic or cultural background. The end
result can be a lack of engagement with patients and lack of
availability of services to members of small ethnic minorities.
Sometimes, the fact that the mental health worker has a different
perspective can be positive and enabling.
Consultation Point 5
Forensic services need to engage with the wider community and
particularly to work with the local voluntary sector. However,
there are again complex problems with engaging with groups that may
not necessarily have a great deal in common except for being a
minority. East London, for example, has areas which encompass
orthodox Jews, Muslims from Pakistan, Hindus from India and
Bangladesh, Afro-Caribbean, African, Turkish and Albanian
communities. The patient mix is drawn from these communities and
there can be considerable problems for the unit in engaging with
the community leaders and the families of patients.
Consultation Point 11
For forensic psychiatry, perhaps the most important issue is
coercion. Most of our patients do not choose us. A lot of patients
are compelled by legislation to come to us and treatments are often
given against the person's will. Secure units involve confinement
and the nature of the unit often means that techniques such as
control and restraint are employed. The length of stay in forensic
services is not always determined by clinical considerations but is
influenced by the prevailing climate in society regarding risk and
attitudes to mentally disordered offenders. There is concern in
this Faculty about the likely increase in the number of black
people detained in the proposed Mental Health Act legislation. One
of the most positive ways of improving better services for black
and ethnic minorities would be around developing innovative ways of
reducing coercion.
February 2004