• November 2008:

The first version of the IFQO Statement of Principles was approved by the Central Policy Co-ordinating Committee and posted on the member’s website.  It will be the first component of the IFQO webpage, to be updated regularly with progress reports from key projects in each country, and further questions and answers will be added as a way of extending its scope and value to readers.

 

A quote from the DHSS in N Ireland states: "While there is currently no policy which endorses activity based funding as the way ahead for funding health services in Northern Ireland, they are running exploratory shadow activity based funding for acute admitted care services during 2008/09".  We have requested further information as to whether there is a plan or current review of routine data returns specifically for mental health.

 

In Wales the One Wales document from the Coalition Government has made it clear (see Section 3) that they will abolish the internal market.  There are a number of Consultation documents on general reorganisation of NHS services and specifically proposals on the future organisation of Mental Health Services, which will set the agenda for the inter-relationship between funding and quality issues.

 

I hope to be able to provide a detailed briefing from Scotland next month on progress of the National Benchmarking Project for Mental Health.

 

In England, College representatives attended a Clinical Conference at St Thomas’s Hospital London on Payment by Results for Mental Health.  With the inclusion of plans in Lord Darzi’s Next Stages Review to begin PBR in MH units by 20010/11, there is little doubt that this is going to happen, but no certainty as to how.  The full set of presentation slides can be found on the DH PBR website.

 

In collaboration with Connecting for Health, a project is being set up to develop a ‘clinical dashboard’ for mental health.  This is a software application that will run alongside the rest of a local computer system, presenting continuously updated information about clinical outcomes and quality measures.  The idea is that individual clinicians and their teams can evaluate their local service using their own chosen measures.

 

With the Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, the College is helping to set up a meeting to develop metrics that might be used in a Public Service Agreement to reduce Social Exclusion.

 

I hope that we will be able to add further Q&As each month to those that are already accessible from the IFQO website.

 

M Elphick

(Specialist Adviser, Information-based Funding, Quality and Outcomes)

 

© 2009 Royal College of Psychiatrists