The latest guidance was issued jointly by the Department of Health and Social Care, Public Health Wales, Public Health Agency Northern Ireland, Health Protection Scotland/ National Services Scotland, Public Health England, and NHS England on 21 August 2020.
The infection prevention and control principles apply to all health and care settings, including mental health and learning disability settings. This guidance supersedes the COVID-19 UK IPC guidance (18 June 2020).
Read the guidance in full.
The three COVID pathways for patients/ individuals are as follows:
- High risk: There is no change in recommendations for IPC or for the use of PPE by staff when managing patients/individuals who have, or are likely to have, COVID-19 – read the high risk pathway guidance.
- Medium risk: This includes patients/individuals who have no symptoms of COVID-19 but do not have a COVID-19 SARS- CoV-2 PCR test result – read the medium risk pathway guidance.
- Low risk: Patients/individuals with no symptoms and a negative COVID-19 SARSCoV-2 PCR test who have self-isolated prior to admission for example following NICE guidance – read the low risk pathway guidance.
You can find the latest information and guidance for each of these pathways, including the PPE required, by clicking each link.
The Resuscitation Council UK has produced:
- guidance for healthcare workers who are performing CPR in mental health, learning disability, and autism inpatient settings (non-acute hospital settings)
- guidance for healthcare workers in the community and primary healthcare settings
- an updated position based on the latest IPC guidance.
For patients allocated to the Low Risk category, the standard pre-COVID algorithms can be used and all healthcare staff attending resuscitation events should wear a minimum of a Type II fluid-resistant surgical mask, eye protection, disposable gloves, and an apron.
In contrast, the current expert consensus from NERVTAG, (the group that advises the government on the threat posed by new and emerging respiratory viruses) is that chest compressions are not considered to be procedures that pose a higher risk for respiratory infections including COVID-19.
Based on this evidence review, the UK IPC guidance therefore will not be adding chest compressions to the list of AGPs. However, they state that “healthcare organisations may choose to advise their clinical staff to wear FFP3 respirators, gowns, eye protection and gloves when performing chest compressions but we strongly advise that there is no potential delay in delivering this life-saving intervention.”
We support the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges' statement which identifies that the evidence itself is inconclusive but has lead two highly respected scientific groups, NERVTAG and RCUK, to draw different conclusions as to the AGP nature of chest compressions and the appropriate course of action with regard to PPE. While that is legitimate, it may create dilemmas for individual clinicians and healthcare organisations.
Along with the Academy, we believe that it is essential that health workers have appropriate protection for the circumstances in which they are working. It is important to recognise that clinical and situational circumstances vary and requirements in different settings will not be the same.
We suggest that mental health and learning disability/autism organisations and clinicians should agree, as soon as possible, on the local policy regarding availability and use of PPE in resuscitation situations in order to provide the proper protection for staff.
It is anticipated that they are guided by the consensus view of those clinicians likely to be involved in resuscitation and that local decisions are transparently agreed, understood, shared and adequately resourced. Risk assessment is the first action in resuscitation and this needs to be undertaken with staff and patient safety foremost.
The necessary equipment must be to hand so that these risks can be met or mitigated in all situations.