Research

How to get involved in research – and enjoy it.

Research can be challenging, stimulating and fun. Your involvement will range from providing data to studies, to supporting multisite studies through to leading research yourself.

Like most things, when you start out you need support. The best way to get a taste of research is to link with an established academic team and work alongside them. They will welcome serious offers of help and should be able to support you with your own work in due course. Be patient. You rarely get awarded Michelin stars for the your first few efforts at cooking. Research is likewise a complex process that takes planning, knowledge, expertise and resources.

Guide to research for child and adolescent psychiatry

Look at the curriculum thoroughly - Victoria Thomas

If I'd looked at the curriculum in sufficient detail, I could have provided all of the evidence the first time round!

I graduated from Newcastle University and completed all of my postgraduate jobs in the UK.  I passed each of the MRCPsych exams at my first attempt, however was unsuccessful in gaining a higher training post in CAMHS.  I then took a staff grade/specialty doctor post, and, as I was settled in this role, I decided not to pursue further training.  

I never planned to apply for CESR, but after a number of years I realised that I would like to have something formal to demonstrate the experience that I had had in my specialty.   Most of my clinical experience had been in an inpatient setting, however I had also done two brief community posts and felt that I had gained sufficiently broad experience to attempt the CESR application.

There were no formal support mechanisms in place for this in my Trust, however I sought advice from a colleague who was also going through the process, and from our SAS Tutor, who had achieved CESR herself.  I attended a course arranged by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and it was useful to hear from other doctors who had been successful and hear from them how they had tackled it. 

I started by looking at the GMC application form and taking note of each section and subsection.  I then looked back retrospectively to find documents, reports, clinical letters etc relevant to each section.  I found this fairly straightforward as I had mostly worked in one Trust, so could easily access electronic records and speak to colleagues to gather evidence. 

I was fortunate that my clinical supervisor at the time was also the clinical director, and was very supportive in helping me gather the evidence and also in validating well over 1000 pieces of paper!    There was a requirement to provide case histories – some of these I compiled specifically for the application, some were amended and anonymised assessment reports etc.

I was not successful in my first attempt.  The feedback I received was extremely comprehensive, and I was given very detailed guidance on what I should provide if I wished to request a review of my application.  From this I learnt that I should have paid more attention to the detail of the curriculum, rather than focussing on how to fill up each section on the application form.  

If I’d looked at the curriculum in sufficient detail, I could have provided all of this evidence first time round, and saved myself the time and expense of the review!  I was also asked specifically for workplace-based assessments relating to the outcomes for which I had not provided sufficient evidence.  I had not included any of these first time round, so now recommend to colleagues considering this process that they do request colleagues to complete these and submit them with their evidence. 

Where there were areas that I found difficult to provide evidence for, for example where I was unable to locate old reports, I found it helpful to include testimonial letters from colleagues who supervised me or were involved in cases with me.   I was able to use SPA time to gain additional more up to date experience in different clinical areas where necessary. 

From the date I made the decision to start the process to receiving the email to say I had finally been successful, was just under two years.  I used most of my annual leave over this time to come into work and gather information, anonymise reports, write up case histories etc.  The process overall was not difficult, just extremely time-consuming and expensive – but well worthwhile!

Victoria Thomas

Child and adolescent research resources

Look at the curriculum thoroughly - Victoria Thomas

If I'd looked at the curriculum in sufficient detail, I could have provided all of the evidence the first time round!

I graduated from Newcastle University and completed all of my postgraduate jobs in the UK.  I passed each of the MRCPsych exams at my first attempt, however was unsuccessful in gaining a higher training post in CAMHS.  I then took a staff grade/specialty doctor post, and, as I was settled in this role, I decided not to pursue further training.  

I never planned to apply for CESR, but after a number of years I realised that I would like to have something formal to demonstrate the experience that I had had in my specialty.   Most of my clinical experience had been in an inpatient setting, however I had also done two brief community posts and felt that I had gained sufficiently broad experience to attempt the CESR application.

There were no formal support mechanisms in place for this in my Trust, however I sought advice from a colleague who was also going through the process, and from our SAS Tutor, who had achieved CESR herself.  I attended a course arranged by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and it was useful to hear from other doctors who had been successful and hear from them how they had tackled it. 

I started by looking at the GMC application form and taking note of each section and subsection.  I then looked back retrospectively to find documents, reports, clinical letters etc relevant to each section.  I found this fairly straightforward as I had mostly worked in one Trust, so could easily access electronic records and speak to colleagues to gather evidence. 

I was fortunate that my clinical supervisor at the time was also the clinical director, and was very supportive in helping me gather the evidence and also in validating well over 1000 pieces of paper!    There was a requirement to provide case histories – some of these I compiled specifically for the application, some were amended and anonymised assessment reports etc.

I was not successful in my first attempt.  The feedback I received was extremely comprehensive, and I was given very detailed guidance on what I should provide if I wished to request a review of my application.  From this I learnt that I should have paid more attention to the detail of the curriculum, rather than focussing on how to fill up each section on the application form.  

If I’d looked at the curriculum in sufficient detail, I could have provided all of this evidence first time round, and saved myself the time and expense of the review!  I was also asked specifically for workplace-based assessments relating to the outcomes for which I had not provided sufficient evidence.  I had not included any of these first time round, so now recommend to colleagues considering this process that they do request colleagues to complete these and submit them with their evidence. 

Where there were areas that I found difficult to provide evidence for, for example where I was unable to locate old reports, I found it helpful to include testimonial letters from colleagues who supervised me or were involved in cases with me.   I was able to use SPA time to gain additional more up to date experience in different clinical areas where necessary. 

From the date I made the decision to start the process to receiving the email to say I had finally been successful, was just under two years.  I used most of my annual leave over this time to come into work and gather information, anonymise reports, write up case histories etc.  The process overall was not difficult, just extremely time-consuming and expensive – but well worthwhile!

Victoria Thomas

Research teams

The Child Psychiatry Research Society (CPRS) was founded in 1972 and exists to foster research in child and adolescent psychiatry, facilitate links between child and adolescent psychiatry researchers, and foster new research and researchers by organising scientific meetings. 

Members can be full members, associate members, honorary members or corresponding members depending on their level of research activity and location. New members are nominated by full members to the secretary, Professor Dasha Nicholls (Imperial College London) d.nicholls@imperial.ac.uk. The current CPRS chair is Professor Alan Stein (University of Oxford).

UniversityTeam leadDepartment or GroupSpecialismHappy to be approached to support CPRS nomination? Y/N
University of BristolDr Helen Bould

Centre for Academic Mental Health


My work concerns the epidemiology, prevention and treatment of eating disorders. I am also involved in work on how young people use the online worldY
Cambridge UniversityProfessor Tamsin Ford, Emeritus Professor Ian Goodyear

Department of Psychiatry

 

The effectiveness of services and interventions for children’s mental health, particularly at the interface with schools.Y
Cambridge UniversityProfessor Paul Ramchandani

Faculty of education

 

Early prevention of mental health problems, play, child development and educationY
Cardiff University School of Medicine Professor Anita ThaparChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Section and Wolfson Centre for Young People's Mental HealthADHD, adolescent depression: genetics, longitudinal research/developmentY
University College DublinProf Fiona McNicholasAcademic Child & Adolescent PsychiatryBurnout; Eating Disorders; Transition; 22Q11DS; Liaison; Pharma o-epidemiology; ADHDY
University College LondonProfessor David SkusePopulation, Policy and Practice Dept, UCL GOS Insitute of Child Health Our primary interest is in rare Mendelian genetic disorders that are associated with cognitive & behavioural phenotypes. Our longitudinal MRC-funded prigram (IMAGINE-ID) is following a national cohort of affected children into early childhood. We also collaborate internationally on Duchenne Muscular Dystrphy studies, including gene therapy, & are developing novel online assessment procedures for detecting ASD in BAME populations.Y
University College LondonDr Priya RajyaguruInstitute of cognitive neuroscience and division of psychiatryEarly prevention of mental health problems, social influences, executive functioning, rumination, repetitive negative thinking, depression, anxiety, adhd, asd, emotion regulation Y
University of Edinburgh  Professor Ian Kelleher  Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Division of PsychiatryWe apply data science approaches to understanding trajectories of mental health and illness from childhood to adulthood. We also carry out pharmacoepidemiological research to understand how treatments in childhood and adolescence might affect mental health outcomes in adulthood. We're especially interested in new approaches to the prediciton and prevention of psychosis. We also look at the health economics associated with mental ill health in childhood and adolescence. Y
University of GlasgowProfessor Helen MinnisAdverse Childhood Experiences LabOur work aims to understand and develop interventions for the mental health problems associated with maltreatmentY
Imperial College LondonProfessor Dasha Nicholls, Emeritus Profesor Elena Garralda, Dr Matthew Hodes, Dr Cornelius AniChild and Adolescent Mental Health Research GroupPrevention and early intervention in young people's mental health, especially emotional and behavioural dysregulation and the interface between physical and psychological health.Y
Kings College LondonProfessor Stephen Scott Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IOPPN)Interventions work to improve child functioning, including reduction of antisocial behaviour and promotion of secure attachment.Y
Kings College LondonProfessor Andrea DaneseStress & Development Lab at IOPPNOur work aims to understand how stressful experiences in childhood affect development and later health, and how to best support children who had such traumatic experiences. Y
Kings College LondonProfessor Emily SimonoffDepartment of Child & Adolescent PsychiatryAutism; ADHD; ID; Antisocial behaviour; Genetics; EpidemiologyY
Kings College LondonDr Gonzalo Salazar de PabloIOPPNPrevention and Early Intervention of psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder/ affective disordersY
University of LeedsProfessor David CottrellDivision of Psychological & Social MedicineUnderstandings of & interventions for self-harmY
Newcastle UniversityDr Aditya SharmaTranslational & Clinical Research Instuitute, Faculty of Medical Sciences

Mood disorders in children, adolescents & young adults.

 

Digital interventions, Global mental health, Paediatric psychopharmacology trials, links with autism & neurodevelopmental disorders

Y
University of NottinghamProfessor Kapil Sayal, Prof Chris Hollis (Full Members); Dr Josephine Holland, Dr Puja Kochhar, Dr Pallab Majumber (Associate Members)Institute of Mental healthOur main research themes & expertise span intervention research (RCTs), Health Services Research, Perinatal & developmental epidemiology; Digital technology; Biological mechanisms undepinning psychiatric disorders; Translational neuroscience; Psychopharmacology; Systematic reviewsY
University of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustDr Pallab MajumderInstitute of Mental healthMental health, illness, intervention and service provision for Looked After Children. Mental health and treatment for refugee children. Transition of care between different parts of the mental health and care system.Y
University of Nottingham and Cambridge & Peterborough NHS Foundation TrustDr Anupam BhardwajInstitute of Mental healthClinical trials for Mood Disorders in children & adolescents; Evidence based service developmentsY
University of OxfordProfessor Alan SteinDepartment of PsychiatryThe development of very young children & adolescents in the face of adversity including parental physical illness, psychological disorders, poverty & malnutrition. Y
University of OxfordProfessor Mina FazelDepartment of PsychiatrySchool-based mental health interventions; Y
University of OxfordDr Tony James & Professor Francis SzeleDepartment of PsychiatryStem cell research in early-onset schizophrenia and healthy adolescents.Y
Queen Mary University of London Professor Dennis OugrinWolfson Institute of Population Health Therapeutic interventions for adolescents with self-harm and understanding early predictors of self-harmY
University of ReadingDr Leticia Gutierrez-Galve Therapeutic interventions for adolescents with self-harmY
University of SouthamptonProfessor Samuele CorteseCentre for Innovation in Mental HealthAdvanced evidence synthesis methods (network meta-analyses, individual participant data meta-anlyses, dose-response meta analyses, umbrella reviews etc) and prediction science in neurodevelopmental disordersY
Tavistock Research UnitDr Eilis KennedyTavistock Research UnitClinical trials; Early intervention & prevention; Longitudinal research; Gender identity; Personalised intervenions Y
University of York (Hull & York Medical School)Professor Bernadka Dubicka (also Honorary MAHSC Chiar Univeristy of Manchester) Department of Health SciencesClinical trials for adolescent depression; brief interventions for depression; online harms; environment & mental healthY
University of York (Hull & York Medical School)Professor Paul TiffinMental Health & Addictions Research GroupMental health services, the health workforce, machine learning and predictive modelling in youth mental healthY

 

Read more to receive further information regarding a career in psychiatry