Whistle-blowing and passing On concerns

When someone passes on to others information about actions in the workplace that are possibly unsafe or illegal this is often called whistleblowing. The General Medical Council (GMC) refers to this as passing on concerns

The GMC’s core guidance in Good Medical Practice states that:

You must protect patients from risk of harm posed by another colleague’s conduct, performance, or health.

If you have good reason to think that patient safety is or may be seriously compromised by inadequate premises, equipment or other resources, policies, or systems, you should put the matter right if possible.

In all other cases you should draw the matter to the attention of your employing or contracting body.

If your employer does not take adequate action, you should take independent advice on how to take the matter further.

You must record your concerns and the steps you have taken to try to resolve them.

Difficulties in taking action commonly include:

  • reluctance to speak directly in criticism
  • fear of retaliation, whether personal or organisational
  • uncertainty about who else to refer to
  • unwillingness to get a colleague into trouble
  • the possibility of legal action for slander or libel
  • assuming other people have already noticed and decided whether or not to take action.

These difficulties are compounded when:

  • there is a considerable power differential, for example seniority
  • there is a culture of collusion
  • your job is not secure.

However, your duty to put patients’ interests first and act to protect them must override personal and professional loyalties. The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 provides legal protection against victimisation or dismissal for individuals who disclose information to raise genuine concerns and expose malpractice in the workplace.

Health Service Circular 1999/198 states that every National Health Service (NHS) trust and health authority should have in place policies and procedures which comply with the Public Interest Disclosure Act and, as a minimum, include:

  • guidance to help staff who have concerns about malpractice raise these reasonably and responsibly with the right parties
  • the designation of a senior manager or non-executive director with specific responsibility for addressing concerns which need to be handled outside the usual management chain
  • a clear commitment that staff concerns will be taken seriously and investigated
  • an unequivocal guarantee that staff who raise concerns responsibly and reasonably will be protected against victimisation.

What to do

Protect (formerly Public Concern at Work) advises that you should:

  • keep calm
  • think about the risks and outcomes before you act
  • remember you are a witness, not a complainant
  • ask for advice.

Don't

  • forget there may be an innocent or good explanation
  • become a private detective
  • use a whistle-blowing procedure to pursue a personal grievance
  • expect thanks.

Effective reporting is part of good clinical governance.

  • Obtain and consult the trust’s whistle-blowing policy or equivalent.
  • Talk things over with a trusted colleague.
  • Aim to improve the situation with the least possible damage to the individual.
  • Generally, discussion with your own manager is advisable unless they are the source of your concern; they may be aware of others’ concerns and be able to approach the individual’s line manager.
  • Keep records of all your observations and actions.
  • Follow local policies such as adverse incident reporting.
  • If necessary, go to a higher level of management, probably the medical director.
  • If the concern is about another health professional, the appropriate routes are usually the employer first, then the regulator (the GMC for doctors).
  • Your role is to bring concerns to the attention of the people responsible for investigating and taking action.
  • When writing, copy in the responsible manager’s manager, but do not send multiple copies.
  • Subsequently, you may not hear about the details of the action but ask for some form of appropriate feedback.
  • If the concern is wider, for instance about a trust’s decision, and you are considering going to the media, obtain expert advice and ensure as far as possible your actions are in line with your employer’s policy.
  • Similar points apply in the private sector, especially for large organisations. It is more difficult with individuals in private practice.

What is whistleblowing?

When someone passes on to others information about actions in the workplace that are possibly unsafe or illegal this is often called ‘whistleblowing.’

Who can I ask for advice?

First consult with a trusted colleague, who may be able to provide you with formal and informal information about your organisation and give you space for reflection.

Protect is a charitable legal advice centre primarily concerned with this issue. You can contact them through their helpline: 020 3117 2520 .

Is whistle-blowing the same as making a complaint?

This type of reporting of concern is about something that affects others (for instance, patients) rather than oneself.

Do I have to be able to prove it?

No. You are acting as an alerting mechanism. But you should be able to show that you have acted reasonably and in good faith.

Keeping records of both observations and of later actions and discussion is strongly recommended.

Who should I tell and how?

First, clarify within your organisation who would be the right person to go to with the particular problem or issue. For senior doctors, the medical director is likely to be appropriate, and for doctors in training this may be a tutor or dean.

Can it be confidential?

It is advisable to check this at the outset. It is helpful if you can be as open as possible, that is, not to report anonymously, and be prepared later to give evidence if necessary. Ideally, there should be a first stage confidential system, where your name is not passed on without your agreement.

What happens to whistle-blowers?

Cultures are changing, but there have undoubtedly been difficulties in the past. However, the term ‘whistleblowing’ is often not used when concerns are raised and appropriately dealt with, so ‘successes’ usually go unrecognised.

How can I avoid antagonism?

Try to avoid isolation on the issue by keeping others involved and informed and do not let it appear to be a personal ‘campaign’ or vendetta. Consider using an independent mentor for support.

For further help and support please contact the British Medical Association, the General Medical Council, or the Care Quality Commission. You can find information about all our other support resources at our Wellbeing hub.

Read more to receive further information regarding a career in psychiatry