MAEP frequently asked questions

Yes. Though initially made available to expert witnesses in the field of mental health, MAEP can be used by any expert providing assistance to courts and tribunals, whatever their profession. The eight domains that form the basis of the assessment support high standards of ethical and professional practice and are relevant to all expert witnesses.

It’s an opportunity to gain insight into how key aspects of your work performance are perceived by people involved in the case (e.g. solicitors and barristers).

Scores and comments can help you to identify areas of good practice as well as areas that you might further develop.

Please visit our About MAEP page to see our current subscription rates.

A subscription to MAEP provides a one-year membership term.

Subscribers complete a self-assessment as well as asking colleagues/professionals for their feedback on a case-by-case basis. The questionnaire for professionals (for example, instructing solicitors) involved in the instant case contain the same questions based on eight domains of expert witness practice.

MAEP reports present self-assessment scores in the context of scores and qualitative feedback from professionals involved in the case. Feedback associated with the particular case is provided in a Case Report. MAEP can also generate a Cumulative Report, which is designed to collate feedback from various Case Reports.

You can generate as many Case Reports and Cumulative Reports as you wish within your membership term.

If you have enough responses, feedback that you can associate with a particular case may assist you more than the same feedback in a cumulative report. Although you may need cumulative reports no more than annually, a circumstance may arise, such as an enquiry from potential instructing solicitors, for which you may want to submit evidence as to your expert witness. 

We recommend that you collect at least two responses for Case Reports.

For a Cumulative Report, at least four responses across all the cases entered on the system are required.

For both reports, this is alongside completing your self-assessment. If collecting the above amount of responses is not achievable, please contact the MAEP team.

In the majority of cases, participants may only wish to request feedback from solicitors and barristers from the parties instructing you.

If your report has been disclosed to other parties involved in the case, you may also wish to seek further feedback from that side’s instructing solicitors, barrister(s), and any expert instructed by them.

If your MAEP report is read by the judge or if you give oral evidence, feedback may also be requested from the judge. Judges in the family courts are expected to provide feedback to experts and may comment on experts and their reports in their judgements. MAEP will enable them to provide structured and anonymous feedback.

You should seek feedback when the case is concluded. In a civil case where a report has been sought at the pre-action stage and proceedings are not issued, it is when the decision is taken not to issue proceedings.

In a civil case which is discontinued or which settles without going to trial, it is following discontinuation or settlement.

If the case goes to trial, feedback may be requested at any point once the proceedings have concluded.

As it may be a while before you have completed cases about which to obtain feedback, you may consider seeking feedback about cases completed in the few months prior to your registration in the scheme.

MAEP can be used to assess performance as an expert in all courts and tribunals and in other circumstances where expert psychiatric evidence is needed to resolve disputes (e.g. civil, criminal, family, employment tribunals and coronial cases).

The tool is suitable for cases that are settled or do not proceed to trial, as well as those that go to trial.

The MAEP process per case will only last as long as it takes for the different people involved in the proceedings to submit their feedback.

Reports can then be produced within one working day of contacting the MAEP team, once all feedback has been received.

A number of people involved in the case will complete the assessments and their responses are aggregated so that negative responses from one person will not greatly affect the mean scores. Please be aware that we do not share individual responses with participants.

If subscribers nominate several people for feedback, they will be able to download their feedback on a case-by-case basis once a minimum of four responses is reached. This means that they will know to which case the free text comments relate. The qualitative feedback can complement your numerical scores and offer additional insight into your strengths and areas for development.

The experience from other multi-source feedback tools which use free text is that participants find this component of the assessment valuable and encouraging.

Firstly, you should take time yourself to reflect on what you can learn from the report.

After that, the best setting to discuss your report is with your peer group and in your appraisal meeting.

You may also want to say that you participate in MAEP on your CV and in any expert witness register.

Discuss any concerns with your peer group, with another trusted colleague or mentor, or the colleague who is conducting your appraisal.

Please remember that MAEP is not an examination; there is no pass or fail, and the process is designed to be formative, which means enabling you to reflect on and improve your practice.

There is no ‘pass’ or ‘fail’ in MAEP.  The inclusion of multi-source feedback in GMC revalidation procedures is to encourage reflective practice, and to ensure that doctors are engaged in a process of identifying areas for improvement.

If you wish to withdraw from MAEP, please contact the team within 30 days of registration and we will offer you a full refund as long as you have not activated your account.